No Child Left Untested!


The Federal Rankings

Under the federal No Child Left Behind act, schools are evaluated by their year-to-year improvement, or "Adequate Yearly Progress." If a school fails to make AYP for two years running, its students are eligible to transfer (and be transported at district expense) to schools with better scores. As of Oct. 1, this sanction applies to eight AISD campuses:

High schools: Johnston, Lanier, LBJ, Reagan, Travis

Middle schools: Burnet, Fulmore, Porter


The State Rankings

The Texas Education Agency uses a single year's data to give schools one of four rankings: exemplary, recognized, acceptable, or unacceptable. No sanctions are directly tied to the rankings. Twenty-three AISD schools were ranked "exceptional" or "recognized," 75 were deemed "acceptable," and five campuses received the lowest ranking:

High schools: Johnston

Middle schools: Webb

Elementaries: Harris, Pecan Springs, Pickle

Seven of the eight schools that failed the federal AYP ranking (all but Johnston) were ranked "acceptable" by the state, and AISD as a whole was ranked "acceptable." For the full report, see www.tea.state.tx.us.


What About the Charters?

Austin's 16 charter schools fared about as well as AISD in the annual state accountability rankings – that is, mediocre. None of the 16 local charters, publicly funded but privately run, received a ranking of "exemplary" or "recognized"; two were "unacceptable," and four were not rated because their high enrollment of students with special needs qualified them as "alternative education" facilities. Critics charge it is unfair to exempt charters from rankings – many regular school districts struggle with the same demographics and still have to face the test-data music – and postulate that the policy is designed to conceal charters' poor performance. In a sad commentary on test data's reliability as a measure of quality, the Texas Academy of Excellence was ranked "acceptable" despite going bankrupt and closing this spring, leaving bills and teachers' salaries unpaid for months. The school's administrators are currently under investigation by the district attorney's office.

Got something to say on the subject? Send a letter to the editor.

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for over 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

Support the Chronicle  

READ MORE
More by Rachel Proctor May
Chartering Middle School
Chartering Middle School
Hoping to reach middle-schoolers who could go off track in a regular school setting, district moves forward with charter school plans

June 2, 2006

TAKS Scores Show Both Improvement and Trouble for AISD
TAKS Scores Show Both Improvement and Trouble for AISD
Numbers down for the crucial third and 11th grades

May 26, 2006

MORE IN THE ARCHIVES
One click gets you all the newsletters listed below

Breaking news, arts coverage, and daily events

Keep up with happenings around town

Kevin Curtin's bimonthly cannabis musings

Austin's queerest news and events

Eric Goodman's Austin FC column, other soccer news

Information is power. Support the free press, so we can support Austin.   Support the Chronicle