"Shakespeare in Print and Performance" at the Ransom Center

This exhibition celebrates the Bard with rare artifacts from the HRC's rare book and theatre arts collections


Scene design for King Lear, Act V, by Norman Bel Geddes, ca. 1917, watercolor on paper.

With the 400th anniversary of William Shakespeare's death mere months away (April 23, 2016 – mark those calendars!), arts institutions worldwide are devoting even more attention to the dramatist now than usual. The University of Texas' Harry Ransom Center is among them, using the occasion to spotlight some of the lesser known – and certainly lesser seen – holdings from its rare book and theatre arts collections. Who knew the HRC even owned John Wilkes Booth's promptbook for Richard III? And yet here it is, part of the curious miscellany of literary and theatrical artifacts in the exhibition "Shakespeare in Print and Performance."

The title should tip you off that the HRC's focus here isn't on the author so much as on his legacy, and it also reveals something of the exhibition's split personality. On the one hand is "Shakespeare in Print," consisting almost wholly of historic copies of printed works in display cases. On the other is "Shakespeare in Performance," a more expansive display of items involved in staging the author's work, primarily in the 19th and 20th centuries: promptbooks for actors and stage managers, painted costume and set renderings, photos and film from productions of note. The former is all about the text and requires a close reading to obtain the full flavor of the English printing industry in the 16th and 17th centuries, and how it affected both Shakespeare's career and later generations' understandings of his plays. The latter is much more into visuals, letting images from various productions illustrate how interpretations of Shakespeare's dramas have changed over time. It's as basic as the difference between a book and a play, between learning about Shakespeare in a classroom and in a theatre.

The thrill of "Shakespeare in Print" stems from the sense of proximity it gives us to the author and his world. Looking at books that mention Shakespeare and were printed while he lived is akin to looking at a newspaper from the past: Through this surviving artifact, we feel a connection across time. And the curators establish how unformed the trades of playwright and publisher were in that era. The former were writing scripts for immediate consumption rather than literary posterity, revising them from one run to the next, collaborating with other writers without credit. The latter, meanwhile, were cobbling together plays to print from handwritten manuscripts, promptbooks, and what actors remembered of their lines, and with spelling and punctuation not standardized, room for variations in texts was huge. Just seeing how that flesh that Hamlet desires to melt goes from being printed as "sallied" (or is it "sullied"?) to "solid" conveys what a rough-and-tumble, make-it-up-as-you-go-along frontier Shakespeare worked in.

By contrast, the world of "Shakespeare in Performance" is one in which the Bard's monumental stature is established, and theatre artists are striving to stage his plays with an artistic vision as grand or profound as his. Whether the look is of elaborate ornamentation and historical authenticity or modernist simplicity and primal power, the impulse behind them is the same: to create a world onstage as compelling as the one the playwright put on the page. And several examples here achieve that aim: The bold King Lear designs by Norman Bel Geddes and the lushly fantastic Midsummer Night's Dream by Max Reinhardt are epic enough to lose yourself in – and you may find yourself wishing you could, in a live performance. The drawback to this part of the exhibition – indeed, to any museum exhibition related to Shakespeare – is that it can carry you only to the edge of a full Shakespearean experience. To get all the way there, you need to hear his words spoken, see his characters live, follow them on their journeys. To the HRC's credit, it's trying to bridge that gap with assorted live readings and screenings of Shake­speare's works, so check its calendar of events.

Even so, "Shakespeare in Print and Performance" may leave you wanting more. Unlike Ransom Center shows such as "Alice's Adventures in Wonderland" and "The Making of Gone With the Wind," this exhibit isn't driven by one overarching vision or narrative. Its dual nature and the very different ways in which its two parts tell their stories make it tough for them to connect or cohere, especially given the smaller space they have to work with. The curatorial team (on which, full disclosure, my daughter Rosalind worked) has assembled a number of fascinating items here that offer tantalizing glimpses into the career and legacy of our Will. It's just that we know there's so much more to see.


"Shakespeare in Print and Performance"

Harry Ransom Center, 21st & Guadalupe, UT campus
Through May 29

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for over 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

Support the Chronicle  

READ MORE
More Harry Ransom Center
"Ed Ruscha: Archaeology and Romance" at the Ransom Center
This evocative excavation into the artist's process of creating art and making books reveals the work of art is the completed book itself

Melany Jean, Oct. 19, 2018

<i>Booth's Richard III</i> by the Hidden Room Theatre
Booth's Richard III by the Hidden Room Theatre
Beth Burns and company unearths a fascinating theatrical time capsule with this version of Shakespeare's tragedy

Shanon Weaver, June 22, 2018

More Shakespeare
<i>Shit-faced Shakespeare</i>
Shit-faced Shakespeare
Highbrow meets lowbrow for an irreverent happy hour take on A Midsummer Night's Dream

Stephanie Carll, Feb. 5, 2016

The Academe Is an Actress
The Academe Is an Actress
Does Shakespeare pass the Bechdel test? and other feminist queries

Rosalind Faires, May 8, 2015

More Arts Reviews
Theatre Review: <i>Unbury Your Gays</i> Fixes the Future
Theatre Review: Unbury Your Gays Fixes the Future
Broad Theatre’s production reveals false histories

Cat McCarrey, June 6, 2025

Visual Arts Review: “Porous Matters” at MASS Gallery
Visual Arts Review: “Porous Matters” at MASS Gallery
Gallery show reinterprets Edwards Aquifer’s low water levels as both urgent and romantic

Teedee Simons, May 23, 2025

More by Robert Faires
Last Bow of an Accidental Critic
Last Bow of an Accidental Critic
Lessons and surprises from a career that shouldn’t have been

Sept. 24, 2021

"Daniel Johnston: I Live My Broken Dreams" Tells the Story of an Artist
The first-ever museum exhibition of Daniel Johnston's work digs deep into the man, the myths

Sept. 17, 2021

KEYWORDS FOR THIS STORY

Harry Ransom Center, Shakespeare, Norman Bel Geddes, Max Reinhardt, First Folio

MORE IN THE ARCHIVES
One click gets you all the newsletters listed below

Breaking news, arts coverage, and daily events

Keep up with happenings around town

Kevin Curtin's bimonthly cannabis musings

Austin's queerest news and events

Eric Goodman's Austin FC column, other soccer news

Information is power. Support the free press, so we can support Austin.   Support the Chronicle