Baird To Rule on Recusal From Willingham Hearing
Willingham family seeks posthumous declaration of innocence
Willingham was put to death for the 1991 arson-murder of his three young children in Corsicana. Willingham maintained his innocence, and since his death, the case has been plagued with questions regarding whether the fire-science used to convict him was flawed and outdated. To date, nine fire experts have weighed in to say the science used by Corsicana fire officials and the Texas fire marshal was indeed outdated. Late last month Willingham's surviving relatives – including his mother, Eugenia – filed a petition in Baird's court asking for him to declare Willingham actually innocent, thus restoring his reputation. The petition also asks Baird to open a court of inquiry to determine whether various unnamed state officials (likely including the Fire Marshal's Office, Gov. Rick Perry, and the Board of Pardons and Paroles) committed official oppression by failing to act – prior to Willingham's execution – on information that challenged the science used to convict him. (Baird's hearing is designed to determine whether there is actually enough evidence to call for a formal court of inquiry.)
The inquiry requested by Willingham's family is like that requested by the family of Timothy Cole, who died in prison before he could be cleared for a Lubbock rape he did not commit. After two days of testimony in that case, Baird concluded last year that Cole was, in fact, innocent.
In the motion filed Oct. 4, Thompson – who inherited the controversy over the capital murder case – argues that Baird should be recused in part because he heard an appeal of Willingham's case when he was a judge on Texas' Court of Criminal Appeals. There, Baird actually voted with the majority to uphold the conviction. Alternately, Thompson argues that Baird might not be impartial because comments on the Austin American-Statesman's website have suggested that Baird is biased in favor of defendants and that Baird has also been given the Courage Award by the Texas Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty.
One thing seems certain: If the hearing does go forward today, it most certainly won't include any official input from Perry's folks. Baird said in court Oct. 6 that upon receiving the Willingham petition he sent letters to the parties named in it, inviting them to participate in the hearing. All but Thompson declined, including Perry's office, which concluded not only that "convicted murderer" Willingham has already had plenty due process but also that Willingham's family's request for him to be declared wrongfully convicted is "inexplicable." According to Perry's general counsel, Caren Burbach, there is no "legal basis" for such a declaration – though it would in fact be like the one Baird made in the Cole case, as Baird acknowledged last week. "I will say this: These are pretty much the same proceedings we engaged in on behalf of Tim Cole," Baird said, "which the governor later recognized and who was posthumously pardoned by the governor."
Jordan Smith, Fri., March 11, 2011
Jordan Smith, Fri., Jan. 14, 2011
Jordan Smith, Fri., Dec. 31, 2010
Jordan Smith, Fri., Oct. 22, 2010
Jordan Smith, Fri., Oct. 1, 2010
Film Review Misses Mark Please make a note not to print any more movie reviews of big action movies by Kimberley Jones. She gets ...
What's the Big Deal? I'm baffled by this obsession with Mueller. I drove through it out of curiosity and it's a suburban nightmare that ...
No Mystery in School Bond Failures How out of touch has the Chronicle become with the voting populace of this city? From the article “Bonds: Death ...
Program Is Vital Resource I am responding to your article on ACCESS News, the program by and for the deaf and hard-of-hearing community. The ...
Finding Rail Route Complicated Michael King, in “The Reading Railroad”, while making valuable points, seems to state that finding an initial route for urban ...
- Follow us@AustinChronicle