Black Is out of Touch, Pissing Reader Off

RECEIVED Fri., June 29, 2007

Dear Louis,
    It really angers me how you assess the character of the conspiracy revealers like a lawyer with no case [“Page Two,” June 29], not touching any of the facts (in how many columns on the subject?).
    Is the unexplained collapse of a third World Trade Center building "circumstantial evidence"? Please tell us! Yes, in talking about conspiracy theorists you "did a lot of generalizing about individuals" – a lot of generalizing about a lot of individuals. Check out this poll of New Yorkers (www.zogby.com/search/ReadNews.dbm?ID=855) showing that half of them believe the U.S. had foreknowledge of the 9/11 attacks and consciously failed to act. The numbers rise in the "under 30" category. And less than two in five believe that all the important questions were answered by the 9/11 Commission. And this was back in 2004, what could it be now after the Democrats gained the House and the criminals still run the show? Are all these people crazy? I am very insulted by your stereotyping, but I'm sure you have a pretty good assessment of me in your head and that I don't matter to you. But let me ask you, based on this poll, who is the nut? Who provides no evidence, and whose ideas are set in concrete? I think it's too important a subject to let go down the memory hole. I'm done reading your opinion pieces, Louis. You are out of touch. We need a progressive newspaper in this city.
Pissed off and offended,
Daniel Cioper
One click gets you all the newsletters listed below

Breaking news, arts coverage, and daily events

Keep up with happenings around town

Kevin Curtin's bimonthly cannabis musings

Austin's queerest news and events

Eric Goodman's Austin FC column, other soccer news

Information is power. Support the free press, so we can support Austin.   Support the Chronicle