Green Tourism

More "Learning from Copenhagen"

Green Tourism

Just planning a trip to Copenhagen, it’s striking how much higher the climate-action consciousness is in Denmark, compared to the U.S. Book a flight, a hotel or tour, and you’re made aware of your climate impact, automatically.

It’s a window into our future: How many years will it be until all such choices in the U.S. are rated for GHG impacts?

On the official tourism site, www.visitdenmark.com, there’s a major section on sustainable vacations: “See how to travel, stay, and eat the ‘green’ way and find suggestions for ‘green’ activities and experiences.” Big headline: “Why Denmark is an environmentally attractive holiday destination.”

The first and sexiest reason cited BY THE TOURISM BUREAU to pick Denmark, for a holiday? “Planning law.” (Be still my urbanist heart!) Denmark promotes its restrictive land-use planning and coastal protections as a reason they’re a hot-and-hip destination! (Inspired, I booked a follow-on short tour in Scandanavia that uses only public transportation – easy to do there.)

In selecting a Danish hotel, you’re asked to consider whether it has earned the “Green Key” - an ecolabel requiring the establishment to meet more than 70 criteria relating to water consumption, cleaning, sorting of waste and electricity consumption. The big Copenhagen Scandic hotel where I’ll be staying cites its “swan” ecolabel right on its homepage. And brags on its “sustainable water” and “Certified organic breakfast since 2001” and Fairtrade™or UTZ certified coffee.

The airline ticketing from the Danish travel agent lists the GHG emissions associated with the flight, right on the itinerary. When you book or confirm online with Skandanavian Airlines (SAS), a pop-up offers to immediately offset your seat’s CO2 emissions. In the spirit of this trip, how could I resist, for $12? SAS also announces its pledge to reduce GHG by 20% by 2020 “regardless of traffic growth.”

What’s evident is that in Europe, the wider public is already well-versed in demanding and rewarding climate-friendly companies. So it’s become a clear marketing advantage – even a necessity – in Denmark to cite climate-impact action and credentials. Tune in to our future …

Got something to say on the subject? Send a letter to the editor.

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for over 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

Support the Chronicle  

READ MORE
More Learning from Copenhagen
Obama's Address at COP15
The president's address to the U.N. Climate Conference

Katherine Gregor, Dec. 18, 2009

PerryGate
Gov. Perry joins climate-change denial party

Katherine Gregor, Dec. 16, 2009

More by Katherine Gregor
Climate Protection: City in No Hurry To Cool It
Checking in on the Climate Protection Program's progress – or lack thereof

Aug. 6, 2010

Climate Change Crosses County Lines
Study predicts how climate change will affect Texas' future water needs

July 30, 2010

KEYWORDS FOR THIS POST

Learning from Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Green, Sustainable, climate

MORE IN THE ARCHIVES
One click gets you all the newsletters listed below

Breaking news, arts coverage, and daily events

Keep up with happenings around town

Kevin Curtin's bimonthly cannabis musings

Austin's queerest news and events

Eric Goodman's Austin FC column, other soccer news

Information is power. Support the free press, so we can support Austin.   Support the Chronicle