Texas Judge Blocks New Federal Overtime Rules

Rule won't go into effect Dec. 1 thanks to Paxton, 20-state coalition

Texas Judge Blocks New Federal Overtime Rules
Illustration by Jason Stout

In a blow to workers' rights today, U.S. District Judge Amos Mazzant of Sherman, Texas, temporarily struck down a new federal overtime rule that would have impacted 4.2 million American employees, including approximately 370,000 Texans.

The new rule, set to go into effect nationwide on Dec. 1, would have doubled the maximum salary an employee working more than 40 hours per week could earn and still be able to receive mandatory overtime pay. Considered one of President Barack Obama’s hallmark legacies, the new rule would have raised the earning threshold to $47,476 ($913/week) from $23,660 ($455/week). The measure sought to improve wage stagnation and make it more difficult for employers to take advantage of their labor force.

However, conservative Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton – in his ongoing quest to sue the federal government at seemingly every turn – and 20 states filed suit against the Department of Labor to fight the rule, alleging the plan forces states, local governments, and private businesses to “substantially increase” their employment costs. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce additionally opposed the rule in a separate suit. “The [Obama] administration assumes that through force of will alone, it could order a new economic reality into existence,” said Paxton in a statement. “The finalized overtime rule hurts the American worker. It limits workplace flexibility without a corresponding increase in pay and forces employers to cut their workers hours. All in all, it exchanges the advantages of negotiated benefits, personal to each worker, with a one-size-fits-all standard that only looks good in press statements. Not on my watch.”

In his 20-page injunction, Mazzant ruled that the Department of Labor overstepped its authority and "ignores Congress's intent" by basing the overtime wages on salary instead of on an employee’s duties: “[I]t is clear Congress intended the EAP exemption to apply to employees doing actual executive, administrative, and professional duties. In other words, Congress defined the EAP exemption with regard to duties, which does not include a minimum salary level."

For an in-depth overview of the new rules and how they would impact local businesses, read last week’s feature, "Welcome to the Working Week-and-a-Half."

Got something to say on the subject? Send a letter to the editor.

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for over 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

Support the Chronicle  

READ MORE
More Labor
Austin Lawmaker Wants to Repeal Fair Chance Hiring Ordinance
Workman's HB 577 would undo Council's job applicant labor protection

Mary Tuma, Dec. 13, 2016

Death on the Job
Construction worker falls to his death on the Eastside

Amy Kamp, July 14, 2015

More by Mary Tuma
Abortion Care Providers “Heartened” After SB 8 Hearing at SCOTUS
Oral arguments focus on law’s vigilante enforcement

Nov. 5, 2021

Abortion Care Providers “Heartened” After SB 8 Hearing at SCOTUS
Oral arguments focus on law’s vigilante enforcement

Nov. 1, 2021

KEYWORDS FOR THIS POST

labor

MORE IN THE ARCHIVES
One click gets you all the newsletters listed below

Breaking news, arts coverage, and daily events

Keep up with happenings around town

Kevin Curtin's bimonthly cannabis musings

Austin's queerest news and events

Eric Goodman's Austin FC column, other soccer news

Information is power. Support the free press, so we can support Austin.   Support the Chronicle