Dear Editor,
Austin’s meager success with transit-oriented development can largely be explained by contrasting Austin with Dallas, where transit-oriented development has been successful [“
Not So Hot TODs,” News, Nov. 26]. The difference is that Dallas has invested heavily in a light rail system which crisscrosses the city and runs day and night. In contrast, Austin’s one line has limited hours. In addition to reflecting how much has been invested in light rail, the different experieces with transit-oriented development reflects the Dallas system’s having been in operation for decades.
The numerous residential high rises Downtown refute Randal O’Toole’s contention that transition-oriented development is doomed due to its failure to offer “single-family homes with large yards.” While many people enjoy lawns, there is obviously a market for attractive multifamily buildings.
Finally, transit-oriented development has to be considered in light of fuel prices and transport infrastructure. As long as fuel prices remain low and funding, including the recently passed Proposition 1, overwhelming favors cars, there is less incentive for transit-oriented development.