Shame, Nikolas and 'Chronicle,' for Not Standing Up for Animals

RECEIVED Tue., Aug. 26, 2008

Dear Editor,
    Re: “Nikolas Wallenda” [Arts, Aug. 22]: I cringed as I read this story of one of the Wallendas returning to perform for Ringling Bros. Circus. Isn't he bothered that major corporations like Sears, Visa, MasterCard, and Denny's have stopped sponsoring Ringling due to a long record of violations of the Animal Welfare Act or that video showed handlers brutally beating animals during training? Doesn't it matter to him that major humane groups across the country, from the Humane Society of the United States to the Texas Federation of Humane Societies, oppose Ringling due to its cruel treatment of animals? To me, Wallenda now symbolizes someone who is willing to turn a blind eye to animal abuse in order to collect a fat check. Shame, Nikolas, for not standing up for animals but choosing instead to work for animal abusers. Like many conscious consumers, I always ask where my food came from or if any animals were abused to make this product or if this product was made in a sweatshop. It's time we all started asking: Were animals abused or forced to perform by this business? And why did the Chronicle support this circus by printing showtimes and how to buy a ticket?
Ernest Samudio
One click gets you all the newsletters listed below

Breaking news, arts coverage, and daily events

Keep up with happenings around town

Kevin Curtin's bimonthly cannabis musings

Austin's queerest news and events

Eric Goodman's Austin FC column, other soccer news

Information is power. Support the free press, so we can support Austin.   Support the Chronicle