AG: Still Wants the Stripper Surcharge
Attorney general to challenge ruling that nudity tax is unconstitutional
By Richard Whittaker, 12:38PM, Mon. Mar. 31, 2008
Well, looks like the Attorney General is going to challenge Friday's ruling by Judge Scott Jenkins that the "Titty Tax" is unconstitutional. This statement released this morning by Communications Director Jerry Strickland:
"One day after Texans were horrified to learn that a Dallas strip club exploited a twelve year-old child by illegally allowing her to work as a “dancer,” it is unfortunate that Texas sexual assault victims may not receive the financial support they were promised. The Office of the Attorney General will vigorously appeal the trial court’s ruling and remains committed to sexual assault awareness and prevention."
Which is interesting, because it doesn't actually say there was anything wrong with Jenkins' judgment. It also doesn't point out that the only people who promised victims of sexual assault anything was the Legislature, which wasn't prepared to give them financial support through the regular state budget, but instead tried to slip through a law with obvious First Amendment issues.
Got something to say on the subject? Send a letter to the editor.
A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for over 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.
Gerald E. McLeod, Oct. 5, 2016
Kate X Messer, July 4, 2013
Austin Sanders, April 7, 2018
June 5, 2025
June 6, 2025
Texas, Taxes, Legislature, Attorney General, House Bill 1751, Sexually Oriented Business, First Amendment, Nudity Tax, Titty Tax