The Common Law

The TikTok ban that wasn’t

I’m in eighth grade and my friends and I are on TikTok all the time. We freaked out when we learned that TikTok was going away. And it did, but then it didn’t. What’s the deal? Why was it canceled, and will it actually go away? – Ava E.

Have you been doomscrolling TikTok lately to see if it’s been banned? You are not alone. The drama surrounding the TikTok ban has been a political and legal roller coaster that is hard to follow. Here’s a breakdown of important events.

In April 2024, Congress passed the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act. The law targeted apps controlled by foreign governments and was specifically designed to ban apps controlled by Chinese companies like TikTok. The law enjoyed bipartisan support and passed the House with a 360-58 vote. Under this law, TikTok’s parent company (ByteDance) was given nine months to divest itself of TikTok by selling it to American (or allied) ownership. Failure to do so would result in a nationwide ban by January 2025.

In May 2024, TikTok filed a lawsuit challenging the law as unconstitutional, alleging it was an improper limitation on free speech and that it was an unlawful taking of private property. A federal appeals court and the U.S. Supreme Court both upheld the ban as constitutional.

On January 18, 2025, TikTok went dark, frustrating millions of TikTok app users. But then TikTok was unexpectedly restored the next day, largely due to President Trump’s incoming administration. President Trump signed an executive order postponing the enforcement of the ban for 75 days, which was a reversal of President Trump’s previous position that was in favor of the ban.

So, while the clock is TikToking (couldn’t resist) on the ban extension, what happens next is anyone’s guess. It’s possible TikTok could be sold to a U.S. owner or could be banned for good.

Please submit column suggestions, questions, and comments to [email protected]. Submission of potential topics does not create an attorney-client relationship, and any information submitted is subject to being included in future columns.

Marrs, Ellis & Hodge LLP, www.mehlaw.com.

The material in this column is for informational purposes only. It does not constitute, nor is it a substitute for, legal advice. For advice on your specific facts and circumstances, consult a licensed attorney. You may wish to contact the Lawyer Referral Service of Central Texas, a non-profit public service of the Austin Bar Association, at 512-472-8303 or www.austinlrs.com.

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for over 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

Support the Chronicle  

One click gets you all the newsletters listed below

Breaking news, arts coverage, and daily events

Keep up with happenings around town

Kevin Curtin's bimonthly cannabis musings

Austin's queerest news and events

Eric Goodman's Austin FC column, other soccer news

Information is power. Support the free press, so we can support Austin.   Support the Chronicle