The Common Law

But I Was Wearing My Seat Belt!

I was wearing my seat belt when I was pulled over for a traffic stop. During the stop I took my seat belt off, and the officer wrote me a ticket for not wearing my seat belt. I want to challenge this in court. Can I win?

Maybe, but success in challenging the ticket will depend on a number of factors. Most importantly, you should consider what, if any, evidence you can show at trial that will support your position that you were wearing the seat belt.

If the main evidence is your own testimony, you'll find yourself in a classic "he said/she said" problem, which refers to a situation in which the evidence that will resolve the dispute is conflicting oral testimony. You will take the position that you wore the seat belt at all times while operating the vehicle and only removed it to more easily comply with the officer's requests for information. Alternatively, you can expect the police officer to testify that he or she witnessed you operating the vehicle without proper use of the safety belt. Assuming no other evidence is presented, as a general rule, judges and juries are much more likely to side with the police officer in these types of minor traffic infractions.

Any additional evidence to support your position will help your case. For example, additional testimony from another car passenger that you were wearing your seat belt might be persuasive. Your chances to win at trial will also increase if the police officer fails to appear in court and provide testimony, which sometimes happens.

Remember that if you do decide to challenge the citation, you must plead "not guilty" by the appearance date located on the bottom of your citation. You can notify the court whether you want a trial by judge or jury when you submit your not guilty plea. After the court receives your plea of not guilty, the case will be scheduled for an appearance docket within 30 days, which will give you a chance to discuss the case with a city prosecutor. You can also waive the appearance docket and be scheduled directly for trial.

Please submit column suggestions, questions, and comments to [email protected]. Submission of potential topics does not create an attorney-client relationship, and any information submitted is subject to being included in future columns.

Marrs, Ellis & Hodge LLP, www.mehlaw.com.

The material in this column is for informational purposes only. It does not constitute, nor is it a substitute for, legal advice. For advice on your specific facts and circumstances, consult a licensed attorney. You may wish to contact the Lawyer Referral Service of Central Texas, a non-profit public service of the Austin Bar Association, at 512-472-8303 or www.austinlrs.com.

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for over 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

Support the Chronicle  

One click gets you all the newsletters listed below

Breaking news, arts coverage, and daily events

Keep up with happenings around town

Kevin Curtin's bimonthly cannabis musings

Austin's queerest news and events

Eric Goodman's Austin FC column, other soccer news

Information is power. Support the free press, so we can support Austin.   Support the Chronicle