Filed: Feb. 6, 2015

Author: Sen. Rodney Ellis, D-Houston

The paperwork may say “an act relating to postconviction forensic DNA analysis,” but if the name weren’t already taken, it would be called the Michael Morton Act. That title was taken in 2013 by SB 1611, another bill by Ellis, barring prosecutors from hiding relevant information from defense attorneys during discovery. This bill would revise the standard for a convicted person to request a new DNA test, and the standard for exculpatory evidence. If passed, there would only have to be “a reasonable likelihood” of evidence containing biological material to get a scientific review. That’s relevant to Morton, who spent 25 years in prison for the 1986 murder of his wife, while Williamson County District Attorney John Bradley and prosecutor Ken Anderson doggedly resisted any attempts to get a bandana found at the crime scene tested. When it was, Morton was exonerated, and the evidence gathered pointed to Mark Alan Norwood, who was eventually convicted. Since then, the Court of Criminal Appeals has reinterpreted the current law in favor of prosecutors, and it may take another Morton bill to avoid another Morton-sized injustice.

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for over 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

The Chronicle's first Culture Desk editor, Richard has reported on Austin's growing film production and appreciation scene for over a decade. A graduate of the universities of York, Stirling, and UT-Austin, a Rotten Tomatoes certified critic, and eight-time Best of Austin winner, he's currently at work on two books and a play.