“This is a real monster,” said Vanderbilt University historian Hugh Graham. Graham wasn’t referring to the latest animated Billy Crystal feature, but to George W. Bush‘s Nov. 1 executive order allowing either the incumbent president or his predecessor to veto the release of the predecessor’s presidential papers. According to the order, the Reagan-era rule — which mandated the release of presidential papers 12 years after the president has left office — is now rescinded. Instead, a former president (or in some cases, a deceased former president’s family) can prevent the release of presidential records, even over the objection of a sitting president. Presidential counselor and former Texas Supreme Court Justice Alberto Gonzales said that opponents would be free to challenge the executive order in court — although he admitted that overturning an executive order judicially could take years.

Historians and journalists have been quick to interpret the Bush order as an attempt to protect his father (Reagan’s vice-president) and other current Bush aides who also served in the Reagan administration. Others have called it an overreaction to the events of Sept. 11 and the current “war on terrorism.” But as Lucius Lomax reported in the Chronicle on Sept. 28 (“W’s Paper Chase,”), at least since 1997 Dubya has been trying to turn his gubernatorial records into federal property. Earlier this year, he succeeded in spiriting them away to College Station and the Bush (the Elder) Presidential Library. Bush’s lawyers have adopted the mysterious position that since the state records of the Bush administration are now in a federal library, they are no longer subject to state law, especially covering open records. (The president is apparently unaware of the old Texas saying, “You can stick your butt in the oven, but that don’t make it biscuits.”)

Just as Attorney General John Ashcroft has used the excuse of “war on terrorism” to lock down as much Dept. of Justice information as possible, so is the president steadily eroding public information law on other matters. But that was nothing new on Sept. 11.

As Hank Williams Jr. might say, “It’s a family tradition.”

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for over 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

Contributing writer and former news editor Michael King has reported on city and state politics for the Chronicle since 2000. He was educated at Indiana University and Yale, and from 1977 to 1985 taught at UT-Austin. He has been the editor of the Houston Press and The Texas Observer, and has reported and written widely on education, politics, and cultural subjects.