by Hugh Forrest
Year by year, big
corporations
gain a tighter grip on life in America. Tax breaks and so-called fair trade
agreements allow them to shift thousands of jobs to low-paid, Third World
workers. Employment opportunities not shipped abroad are given to temporary
workers, thus allowing the same companies to avoid costly benefit programs.
Elsewhere, traditional mom-and-pop businesses are being destroyed by a wave of
nondescript chain stores that have swept the country like wildfire. Even sports
franchises now conspire against the working man, moving from city to city as
new stadiums promise a few billionaire owners huge revenues from the sale of
lavishly furnished, corporate-owned “luxury boxes.”
Scary stuff. But America as a “corporate state” is not a new concept – we’ve been heading in that direction since the industrial age of this country
began. Such trends have also drastically impaired the ability of American media
to cover these issues. The independently owned daily paper is largely a thing
of the past, replaced by a bland publication whose parent company probably has
significant holdings in radio, television, and cable throughout several U.S.
markets. As for the major networks, they now represent a small bump in the
extensive portfolio of some giant entertainment conglomerate. Speak out and you
might wind up like Jim Hightower, whose controversial call-in radio show was
canceled shortly after ABC was purchased by Disney.
But there’s always hope that this unfortunate trend can be reversed. Or at
least that’s the prevailing logic behind the Progressive Populist, a new
monthly publication edited by Austinite Jim Cullen, a former associate editor
of The Texas Observer. Printed in tabloid format, the inaugural issue
boasts contributions from Ralph Nader, Jesse Jackson, Ronnie Dugger, Molly
Ivins, Jim Hightower, media critics Jeff Cohen and Normon Solomon, plus a host
of accomplished freelancers. Stories in this 24-page issue cover everything
from union-busting to the struggles of the family farmer, the minimum wage and
the Earned Income Tax Credit to ongoing attacks on environmental regulations.
“The basic philosophy of this paper is that people are more important than
corporations,” explains the 41-year-old Cullen. “We believe that corporations
have taken too great a role in government and that the people need to work to
reestablish democracy.” Also noteworthy is the populist belief that the
political landscape must be viewed from top to bottom – wealthy to poor – not left to right. Cullen stresses the importance of papers like Progressive
Populist in delivering this message, since it is one routinely ignored by
traditional press outlets: “The mainstream media does not address the issue of
the concentration of power in corporations because by and large these outlets
are owned by the same large corporations.”
Nor do a lot of mainstream politicians. The inaugural issue of the new paper
contains essays from Sen. Tom Harkin (D-IA) and former Sen. Eugene McCarthy
(D-SD). The publication also contains the promise that “we will not be a
Democratic Party organ; we will support progressive Democrats, progressive
independent or alternative candidates if they have a chance of winning, and, if
any progressive Republicans shows themselves, we will give them a hearing.” To
this end, Cullen concedes that one of the more confusing aspects of the current
political spectrum is that GOP candidates are often more skilled at marketing
their concerns as those of the common man. Notes Cullen, “Republicans have done
a lot better of taking populist symbols and drafting it into their corporate
agenda.”
As for the paper’s role in this dialogue, Cullen summarizes it as such: “We
aim to make the Progressive Populist the antidote to the monopoly daily
news, throw a lifeline to progressives who feel like they are stranded in a sea
of conservatives, and maybe play a role in reviving political debate.” He views
the target audience as working people, small business owners, farmers and
ranchers: “A lot of people are surprised when you say you are trying to attract
small business owners, because they often characterize these people as
conservative. But a lot of these small business owners are very, very concerned
about the increasing power of large corporations, especially those who live in
smaller towns.”
Take away the small town caveat and Cullen could well be describing his own
foray into the world of publishing. Operated on a shoe-string budget (brothers
Art and John Cullen design and print the publication at their Iowa-based
Storm Lake Times), the paper only needs a few thousand subscriptions to
reach the break-even point. Eventually, Cullen says, he’ll try to sway a few
advertisers, but only after he’s completely satisfied with the editorial
content. And he remains undaunted by recent encroachments of electronic media
to a world once dominated by print: “There’s still a big role for print media
in our society. Some people just don’t want to read a newspaper over the
computer.”
For those who do, however, the Progressive Populist has its own web site
(http://www.eden.com/~reporter), a site that has already generated about 200
subscriptions. Or call 447-0455 for a free sample issue of the new paper.
Colorful Commentary
While the silly and error-prone Channel 42 news team seems undeterred in itsmission to redefine all standards of bad broadcast journalism, K-EYE is to be
commended for the recent addition of two political commentators. Viewers can
now catch the opinions of award-winning liberal Molly Ivins and nationally
renowned conservative Jack Chambers on the brief “My Turn” segments at the end
of the station’s newscasts. Ivins and Chambers appear (separately) about once a
week, and their commentaries usually last about a minute to 90 seconds each.
K-EYE management should be applauded for this innovative move, and strongly
encouraged to give the two entertaining pundits more visibility. Hey, they’ve
finally done something right. n
This article appears in November 24 • 1995 and November 24 • 1995 (Cover).