With apologies to George Bernard Shaw`s Major Barbara — “What price
safety now, Chief Watson? What price?” Mike Sheffield, vice president of the
Austin Police Association, wants to know. He’s still scratching his head over
what went down Monday with a 6-1 city council vote (Eric Mitchell dissenting)
to raid the police department’s community programs of 16 officers for
front-line duty on the streets. More officers cruising the city is all well and
good, but Sheffield wonders at what cost. “We’re cutting off the lines of
communication to the community, and that’s a step backward, not forward,” he
says. “Taking officers away from vital community programs is just plain wrong,
but go figure.” Police Chief Elizabeth Watson initially raised residents’ ire
by suggesting cutting 36 officers from the programs for front-line duty.
Council settled on a lesser number. “The council has spoken,” Sheffield says,
“and time will prove one of us right.”…

Nobody gets more riled about garbage than the people who create it. That’s
been the drift of all the hurt and angry letters running in the daily the past
few weeks. Their opposition to a proposal to pay extra cash for extra trash did
little good. City Council Tuesday approved a measure in which residents will
pay $2 for every garbage bag that doesn’t fit in their trash container.
Customers will also have to cough up more change to cover their monthly garbage
bills. The new fee is $12, up from $11.64. But look on the bright side. Solid
Waste Services Director Willie Rhodes is upping the types of materials the city
will recycle, which means we’ll be able to throw everything from junk mail to
cereal boxes to more plastic stuff into our recycling bins…

Local gay activists weren’t surprised by the Senate vote Tuesday nixing gay
marriages. But the ever-so-narrow defeat of another measure, banning
discrimination against homosexuals in the workplace, renewed hopes for the
bill’s eventual passage. Eugene Sepulveda, of the Austin chapter of the Human
Rights Campaign, says he was somewhat cheered by the narrow margin — a 50-49
squeaker — by which the anti-discrimination bill lost in the
Republican-dominated Senate. “If Kay Bailey [Hutchison] had voted for the bill
it would have passed,” he says, referring to Vice President Al Gore’s guarantee
of breaking the tie vote in favor of the bill. “We were told that even as late
as Monday she was still undecided.” He added that the gay and lesbian community
could have done a better job of registering phone calls of support to
Hutchison’s office. Still, Sepulveda says, “We came closer than anyone would
have projected six months ago. It looks like we’re becoming a little less of a
threat.”…

“Give me that old-time, mainstream religion” will likely be the refrain at a
soul-searching conference Sept. 27-28 at University Baptist Church, 2200 San
Antonio St. Cecile Richards’ Texas Freedom Network, along with the Texas Faith
Network, is sponsoring the middle-of-the-road faith fest, with keynote speakers
from near and far. Among the Washington, D.C.-based guests will be Elliot
Mineberg of People for the American Way; Dr. James Dunn of the Baptist Joint
Committee, and the Rev. Jim Wallis of Call to Renewal. Topics will include the
Ten Commandments for dealing with the religious right, and the role of the
religious community in supporting policies that don’t punish the poor. Call
322-0545 for more information…

That Hillary Clinton sure knows how to draw a crowd. A youthful mass of more
than 1,000 turned out for her Sept. 6 appearance at the University of Texas. To
be sure, the people who walked through the doors of the Texas Union Ballroom
that mid-day weren’t exactly there for the opening acts of Sen. Gonzalo
Barrientos, District Attorney Ronnie Earle, or Texas Land Commissioner Garry
Mauro, all of whom tried to work the crowd into a respectable frenzy before the
First Lady took the spotlight. By the time UT Regent Bernard Rappaport grabbed
the mike for a rather long-winded speech, everyone’s patience was wearing thin.
“Let her speak!” pleaded one. Mauro scored some points, though, for steering
clear of the usual rhetoric and giving us a glimpse of Clinton rolling up her
sleeves as a young volunteer canvassing South Texas barrios during the 1972
George McGovern presidential campaign. — A.S.

S.O.S. is S.O.L.

…At least for now, anyway. Members of the Save Our Springs Alliance and other
local environmental groups have been beseeching the council to retroactively
enforce the S.O.S. water-quality ordinance for those 20 months that it was on
appeal, and to repeal the weaker Composite II water-quality ordinance. The
council has leaned towards keeping Comp II in place, but has not voted on the
issue. The undying holdout was Councilmember Daryl Slusher, who has requested a
delay pending city staff information on just how much development Comp II would
allow in the Barton Creek Watershed. The S.O.S. Alliance had hoped Slusher
would use the information to help drum up council support to make S.O.S. apply
to developers who were granted permits during the 20-month period. But there
won’t be a vote on the issue, because Slusher has fallen in line with his
colleagues.

To make matters worse for the alliance, Slusher has severed the lines of
communication. S.O.S. legal eagle Bill Bunch and his old pal Slusher are no
longer speaking to one another. The tiff stems from an August 27 meeting at
Threadgill’s Restaurant, which Slusher called to hear environmentalists’
positions on which ordinance should be enforced. At the meeting, Slusher
announced that he favored the Comp II. According to Slusher, Bunch, who is
pondering whether to sue the city, presented his legal argument to make S.O.S.
retroactive, and then suggested that Slusher should at least abstain from the
council vote on Comp II. That way, if one other councilmember also abstained,
the council would only get five votes to keep Comp II in place, and S.O.S would
still remain in effect.

“He didn’t want me to mess up his case,” Slusher says of Bunch. Slusher says
he told Bunch that colluding with the Alliance would be tantamount to abetting
a lawsuit against the city. “I immediately said it was wrong and suggested that
no one say it again,” recalls Slusher. “They did.” Since then, he adds, “I have
been ignoring, refusing to communicate, with them.” Slusher plans to maintain
the communication blackout as long as the Alliance considers suing the city.

Bunch, who says he would rather not litigate against the city, would not
confirm Slusher’s rendition, except to say, “That’s not how it happened.” He
is also careful to add that there is no dispute: “Daryl’s done an amazing job
so far, and it would be real unfortunate if what’s happened gets blown out of
whack.” — A.M.

ACC Board-to-Be’s

There are eight candidates vying for an appointment to fill the single vacancy
on the Austin Community College Board of Trustees, but some observers already
are putting their money on a board split between two top contenders: Sharon
Knotts Green, external education manager at Motorola, and William Spelman,
associate professor at LBJ School of Public Affairs at UT. Spelman narrowly
lost to Board Chair Carol Nasworthy in last spring’s election.

In that race, Spelman was among those questioning the wisdom of ACC’s decision
to acquire the Shadowridge tract for a new campus in Southwest Austin. The
property is located in a contributing zone of the Edwards Aquifer. Green, on
the other hand, is considered a moderate Shadowridge supporter.

Come September 23, all eight applicants will put on their interviewing suits
and brace themselves for a public interrogation before the ACC Board. They want
to fill the slot left vacant by banker Pete Foster, whose job recently took him
to Houston. The penny-pinching board is trying to save money by appointing a
new trustee instead of holding an election.

The candidates, in addition to Green and Spelman: Richard Durbin, director of
development for Outreach Health Services; Christa Easley, vice president of
Austin Clinical Research, Inc.; Hector Ortiz, community liaison for UT
Neighborhood Longhorns Program; James Pfluger, owner of Pfluger Associates
Architects; Richard Schafer, owner of Custom Model Products; and Fred J.
Waddell, retired teacher and administrator. — A.S.

Kickin’ Grass

If you’re wary of trying to nurse that water-guzzling St. Augustine grass
through another scorching summer, try cultivating horseherb (Calyptocarus
Vialis). The low-growing, four-leafed native plant with tiny yellow flowers has
long been considered a weed in Central Texas, where it often springs up
voluntarily on lawns. But thanks to Andy and Sally Wasowski, authors of
Texas Native Plants, the weed has gained new respect among local lawn
lovers. Unlike St. Augustine, horseherb doesn’t require watering through dry
spells. Since the recent deluge, scads of horseherb has sprung up where drought
stress wiped out patches of grass.

Charles Pingleton, master gardener for the Travis County Agricultural
Extension Service, says he encourages horseherb in the shady areas of his
two-acre residential lot. Horseherb fades off during dry weather, but springs
back with new rain, he says. It can stay evergreen during mild Austin winters,
but will go dormant during a freeze. Plus, the hearty herb tolerates moderate
foot traffic, and, unlike other ground covers, responds well to mowing.

Tony Gregg, the city’s Division Manager for Water Conservation, has a similar
water-conserving idea for gardeners. He recommends new strains of Buffalo Grass
such as Prairie Buffalo, or 609, for sunny areas. The old standard Bermuda
Grass is fine for sunny areas too, says Gregg. Drought browns it out, but does
not kill it, and it comes back green after a rain.

Despite St. Augustine’s craving for water, 80% of Austin’s builders still
continue to plant it around new homes since it is cheap and easy to establish,
says Scott Seidel, manager of The Grass Patch Landscaping Company. Ironically,
the St. Augustine may stay in full sun for years and require soaking with
thousands of gallons of water before trees grow tall enough to provide shade.
N.E.

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for over 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.