AISD trustees have set the date for a $369.4 million bond election: Saturday,
April 13. Early voting will be March 25-April 9. The package is divided into
three sections for your consideration: $120.5 million in renovations throughout
the district, $177 million to build new schools and classroom additions, and
$71.9 million for safety and security upgrades and infrastructure for
technology. District officials claim that the package is driven by
instructional needs, and will not accommodate any new growth in AISD; but some
detractors say otherwise. For more information on that issue and others
surrounding the bond package, stay tuned for upcoming coverage. Three AISD
trustee races will follow close on the heels of the bond election, coinciding
with city council races on Saturday, May 4. Early voting will be April 15-30.
Ted Whatley, Liz Hartman, and Diana Caste�eda have all indicated that
they will run for re-election. — R.A.
Off The Desk:
Despite efforts to negotiate their release, the Free Papua Movement (OPM), anindigenous rebel group, continues to hold 13 hostages in a remote section of
Irian Jaya, some 100 miles east of Freeport-McMoRan’s giant gold and copper
mine. The OPM kidnapped 26 people in a remote village of Irian Jaya’s Baliem
Valley on January 8. Half of the hostages were later released, but the OPM
continues to hold four British students, two Dutch students and seven
Indonesians. As the hostage situation drags on, Dutch and British officials,
including a hostage negotiating team from Scotland Yard, have gotten involved
in the negotiations, but no breakthroughs have occurred… More bad news for
the boll weevil eradication program, the one that farmers say does more harm
than good. The Mississippi Boll Weevil Management Corp. has received a petition
with 325 signatures that will force an election later this month on the
eradication program in that state. Mississippi cotton farmers within the boll
weevil eradication zone had losses similar to those that occurred here in
Texas. Last month, farmers in the Rio Grande Valley voted by a margin of almost
3 to 1 to end the eradication effort in that region. Meanwhile, farmers in the
San Angelo area are trying to collect the 560 signatures needed to force an
election in that region — R.B.
Son of Barton Creek Properties?
A proposal for a 333-acre Planned Unit Development [PUD] on endangered specieshabitat is being sped through the city’s development process to avoid adherence
to strict development regulations that become effective in May, complain local
environmentalists. But a lawyer for the development and an employee within the
city’s environmental department counter that the project is already exempt from
the new regulations.
PWB Joint Venture/Perot Group, partly owned by H. Ross Perot, has proposed a
2.2 million square-foot development at the Northeast juncture of FM 2222 and RM
620. The PUD — originally approved in the 1980s under the Lake Austin
Watershed Ordinance, but later put on hold as political controversy swelled
over environmental issues in the early 1990s — is coming back to haunt
environmentalists at a time when “property-rights” hold sway.
The proposed development is near Bull Creek, and includes a hotel, numerous
office buildings, and two research and development campuses on land that is
home to nine endangered species. According to a November 13 environmental
analysis by The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service [FWS], those species include the
Golden Cheeked Warbler and the Black-Capped Vireo.
“Every piece of the 333 acres is occupied by warbler habitat,” says Joe
Johnston, FWS Senior Biologist. To obtain a 10(A) permit from FWS to develop
the land, PWB Joint Venture is setting aside 182 acres as a preserve. But
environmentalists say the proposed impervious cover, which amounts to 31% of
the project, including the preserves, would still make deadly inroads into the
warbler habitat.
Biologist Chuck Sexton, a then-city environmental specialist, said in a
Daily Texan article in 1990 that the development would destroy 80-100%
of the warbler nesting sites. Karen Hadden, a member of Citizens Organized to
Defend Austin (CODA), notes that, aside from the PUD’s decreased plans for
square footage, “Not a whole lot [about the revised development] has
changed.”
Hadden and other environmentalists complain that the developer is trying to
rush the project through for council approval, before their 10-year grace
period from the Comprehensive Watershed Ordinance (CWO) ends on May 18. In
other words, the company submitted their site plan in May, 1986, before the CWO
was approved. They had ten years to begin construction under the Lake Austin
Watershed Ordinance, which was then in effect. Environmentalists are saying
that if the company misses the May 18 deadline, they could be subject to the
CWO. “Not much happened for a long time, and now all of a sudden they’re
trying to get it passed by council,” Hadden says.
But attorney Robert Kleeman, of Minter, Joseph, Thornhill, which is
representing the company, denies trying to beat the CWO deadline. He says the
PUD Land Use Plan must be responsible only to the Lake Austin Watershed
Ordinance, which is less stringent than the CWO. Joe Calabrese, of the Drainage
Utility Department, agrees. He says the current plan will remain effective, and
so will the exemption, even after May 18. Thus, the developer shouldn’t care
about gaining council approval before the grace period ends.
The council approved minor revisions to the PUD Land Use Plan on first reading
on December 14. A date for a second reading has not been set. — A.M.
Hey… Tack-SEE!
A presentation at the city council’s Wednesday work session last week evolvedinto an impromptu public hearing on a proposed change in the way the city
regulates taxi cabs, limos, buses, and other vehicles for hire.
Assistant City Manager Joe Lessard summed up the findings of a task force,
whose recommendation is to change the city code and create a new ordinance that
takes Austin from a franchise system, in which the city regulates access to the
market, to a free market permitting system, in which the city simply issues
permits and funds safety inspections by a private company, while letting the
marketplace and free enterprise decide who stays in business. The ordinance
would further open the city’s doors to operators of shuttle buses.
Lessard told the Chronicle that he supports the task force’s findings
and the free-market option, which, he adds, is the approach taken by most
comparable cities. “It’s a lot simpler. It’s a lot more straightforward.”
The task force itself was created due to a rising number of complaints
following the city’s decision to cut funding for the inspection program in
1994. At the meeting, Councilmember Gus Garcia addressed safety concerns with a
point-blank question to Lessard: “Do we have unsafe, uninsured providers on the
streets of Austin?”
“We do not inspect each vehicle to ensure that they are safe,” Lessard
replied.
Addressing the issue of privatizing the inspection process, Hannah Riddering,
a driver with American Yellow Checker, alleged that a popular private company,
Lemon Busters, which now does inspections in San Antonio, has an incentive not
to pass vehicles because they charge for each inspection.
Watching quietly in the back of the room, in crisp, white Lemon Buster’s
T-shirts, sat John Adams and Barry Sprague, co-owners of the six-year-old
Austin-based company, which is statewide and growing. When approached by a
reporter, they responded to the charge that they have an incentive not to pass
vehicles. “It’s totally erroneous,” Adams said, noting that the second
inspection is free. But he added that in order to encourage compliance,
subsequent inspections do cost.
Adams and Sprague added they are the best at what they do and are the pioneers
of their industry. But even if the concept is approved, Lemon Busters would
have to be the low bid to win the city contract to perform the inspections. “It
will be a competitive process. We’re interested in seeing what they do,”
Lessard said. According to Lessard, before that bridge is crossed, others,
including the rest of the council, franchise holders, and riders, will get a
chance to weigh in on the issue at future public hearings. — J.R.
Sharp Drops Smart Bomb
Few statewide elected officials get more positive ink than Texas ComptrollerJohn Sharp. There’s a reason: Sharp’s job allows him to make lots of political
hay while posing as a number-crunching dweeb.
Last week, the state’s number-one nerd unveiled a plan that could save the
state hundreds of millions of dollars. Sharp wants to use high-powered computer
systems to fight Medicaid fraud, which, in Texas, may be costing taxpayers $1
billion per year, according to General Accounting Office estimates.
Sharp plans to ferret out fraud using neural networks — computer systems
which mimic the workings of the human brain. Instead of neurons, however,
neural networks rely on a series of processing units which are trained through
repetition to recognize patterns in streams of data. Gradually, the system
learns to categorize patterns and call them to the attention of system
operators.
Neural networks, which were first developed in 1949, did not gain widespread
attention until the Gulf War, when they were used to help guide rockets and
ordinance toward tanks and other targets on the battlefield. They’ve never been
used to pinpoint fraud in the vast Medicaid system. But they have already
proven their value in the private sector. “It’s a great technology to help us
fight credit and debit card fraud,” says Gail Murayama, a spokesperson for Visa
International, which began using a neural network on its computer system in
1993. “Our counterfeit fraud losses are down 18%,” said Murayama. “Since
January of 1995, Visa’s member financial institutions have saved $100 million
by using the neural networks.”
Sharp says he expects the system to find the first cases of Medicaid fraud by
April. The entire system will be operational September 1 this year. —
R.B.
This article appears in February 9 • 1996 and February 9 • 1996 (Cover).