The state’s virtual charter school promoters are apparently determined to do another end run around the Legislature’s repeated refusal to authorize their schemes for home-based online schools taught using software and computer equipment purchased with public-school funds. Turned away in several attempts during the 78th Legislature, the virtual vampires recruited the University of North Texas to submit a virtual charter program earlier this fall, but in the face of statewide and on-campus opposition, UNT administrators withdrew their bid to the Texas Education Agency.

Now Eagle Academies of Waco — a charter running online schools in several cities, including Austin — has applied for an “amendment” to its state charter for three schools (Beaumont, Waco, and McAllen/Pharr) to add 1,000 pupils and become effectively a “virtual school” for the entire state. Texas Education Commissioner Robert Scott has until Dec. 24 to make a decision on the application, or it goes into effect automatically. On Monday as the Chronicle went to press, TEA spokesperson Debbie Graves Ratcliffe said that she expected Scott’s decision to be issued the next day and that she understood the staff recommendation is to reject the application, primarily because the Eagle Academy schools “do not have a stellar record” on state accountability standards. According to an April 4 Chronicle report by Michael May, “Chartered Well … and Badly,” nine of Eagle’s 23 charters have been rated “low-performing” for the past two years.

The Chronicle recently obtained a Sept. 10 memo from Eagle administrator Barbara Hinkle to Kirsten Christophersen in the charter division of the TEA, in which Hinkle wrote, “At the request of Robert Scott, Eagle Academies of Texas is preparing documentation to submit an amendment for a statewide Virtual Academy,” and asked for advice about preparing the documentation. (At press time, Hinkle could not be reached for comment.)

Ratcliffe said that she was told Eagle Academy first contacted Scott about making the application, and simply was informed about how to proceed. “I don’t think there was any ‘Nudge, nudge, wink, wink’ [from Scott] that Eagle should apply,” Ratcliffe said. At least 80 school districts reportedly wrote to the agency opposing Eagle’s application.

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for over 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

Contributing writer and former news editor Michael King has reported on city and state politics for the Chronicle since 2000. He was educated at Indiana University and Yale, and from 1977 to 1985 taught at UT-Austin. He has been the editor of the Houston Press and The Texas Observer, and has reported and written widely on education, politics, and cultural subjects.