Diane Hyatt (l) and Bill Moriarty Credit: Photo by John Anderson

Last Wednesday, Jan. 27, the Bill Moriarty case landed at the 3rd Court of Appeals. In 2005, Moriarty was dismissed as program director of the Austin Clean Water Program by general contractor Earth Tech, after the city discovered that he and Diane Hyatt, of the tech firm Hyatt and Associates, had become a couple sometime during Moriarty’s tenure and that Hyatt’s firm had been assigned ACWP contracts – although Moriarty did not handle contract assignments.

The city auditor and other investigators found no wrongdoing, but City Manager Toby Futrell said the perceived conflict of interest and a failure to disclose it required Moriarty’s dismissal, and she prevailed upon Earth Tech to drop the hammer. Moriarty and Hyatt claimed that in fact rival contractors and their lobbyists had conspired to pressure Futrell to oust him, and in 2006 they sued city officials and several contracting firms and their representative. The officials settled later that year; District Judge Margaret Cooper granted a summary judgment in favor of the remaining defendants, primarily for insufficient evidence that their influence at City Hall led to the dismissal.

The issue under appeal last week was whether those defendants – various engineering firms, among them CH2M Hill, Malcolm Pirnie, and PBS&J, as well as former mayor and now lobbyist Bruce Todd – must instead stand trial for “tortious interference” with Moriarty’s Earth Tech contract, for having pressured Futrell and former Assistant City Manager Joe Canales to find some reason to remove Moriarty. Moriarty’s attorney Robert Notzon argued that a jury needs to determine whether Futrell and Canales were telling the truth when they testified in depositions that the contractors’ influence was not the reason for removing Moriarty; the defendants’ attorneys countered that there is insufficient evidence to sustain that claim and that, in any case, Futrell didn’t need a reason to ask for a new program director. The appeals court is expected to make its ruling later this year.

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for over 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

Contributing writer and former news editor Michael King has reported on city and state politics for the Chronicle since 2000. He was educated at Indiana University and Yale, and from 1977 to 1985 taught at UT-Austin. He has been the editor of the Houston Press and The Texas Observer, and has reported and written widely on education, politics, and cultural subjects.