Credit: Photo by John Anderson

Groundwater “in place” below a landowner’s property belongs to the landowner; therefore, if a water district – say, the Edwards Aquifer Authority – wants to restrict the landowner’s use of that water it may do so – but not without properly compensating the landowner, the Texas Supreme Court ruled unanimously last week in an opinion authored by Justice Nathan Hecht. (You can find the opinion at austinchronicle.com/documents/groundwater.pdf.)

Experts say the ruling will likely have far-reaching implications in the state, which has been suffering from the one-two punch of a historic drought and a record state budget deficit.

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for over 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.