“Black women are 19 times more likely to be infected than white women … because so many black men have unprotected sex with other men but then conceal that fact and have unprotected sex with women, too.”
This categorical – and problematic – statement was made recently in a widely circulated article by Atlanta Journal-Constitution and AP writer Cynthia Tucker. Race aside, there are some men “on the down-low,” as it’s called, and sometimes HIV transmission occurs. The problem is, how often? We don’t know whether her assertion of high degree or pervasiveness is true or not.
The thrust of her piece is absolutely on target and backed by substantial scientific evidence: disproportionate rates of HIV/AIDS among African-Americans, especially black women, the majority of whom now list heterosex as their risk; and rampant homophobia among blacks contributing to HIV infection among homosexual black men.
However, studies and statistics say only what they say, nothing more – including the stats from which Ms. Tucker imputes her statement; they shouldn’t be squeezed into saying anything else. Not one study has ever examined the level at which down-low operates. Therefore, we do not know to what degree it contributes to black women’s HIV infection. There are only anecdotes – not data or solid information.
The recent hoopla about down-low – The New York Times, Oprah, Essence magazine, etc. – sprang from publicity campaigns for two books about the authors’ personal experiences. There is no science involved.
Without evidence to back up your position, Ms. Tucker, categorical and blame-laying statements only contribute to the very real phenomenon of homophobia and AIDS stigma that you so articulately illuminated. That doesn’t well serve anyone concerned, black women included.
This article appears in July 8 • 2005.