Legal Heat Rises on Vote-by-Mail

Dallas Dems file criminal complaint against attorney general

In the latest wrinkle of the Texas vote-by-mail wars, two Dallas Democrats on Monday, May 11, filed a criminal complaint against Ken Paxton, charging the attorney general with intentionally misleading election officials, and alleging "felony election fraud."

The complaint is based on Paxton's recent letter to 254 county judges and election officials, threatening criminal prosecution against any official who advises voters that they are eligible to vote by mail due to the coronavirus pandemic – as ruled April 17 by state District Judge Tim Sulak. According to affidavits filed with Dallas County District Attorney John Creuzot, Kendall Scudder (former state Senate candidate, a member of the Texas Democratic Party Executive Committee, and co-host of Pod Bless Texas) and attorney Woot Lervisit allege that Paxton's May 1 letter constitutes "felony election fraud" under the state criminal code because it intentionally provides "misleading statement(s), representation, or information" to an election official.

Paxton has appealed Judge Sulak's ruling to the 1st Court of Appeals in Houston (initially to the 3rd Court, transferred this week to the 14th) and takes the position that his Notice of Appeal automatically stays the Sulak order (a notion disputed by the other parties to the litigation, the TDP, and independent intervenors). In summarizing his claim, via Paxton's letters, tweets, and other communications, Lervisit says Paxton's actual intent is not election guidance, but in fact "to mislead voters about vote by mail eligibility, to disseminate fear through press releases and social media posts about the letter, and to enhance his political reputation." According to the affidavits, the filed complaints automatically initiate a criminal investigation by Creuzot.

In addition to the state lawsuit filed by the TDP that led to Sulak's ruling, there are now three different federal lawsuits alleging that the state's position on VBM creates an unconstitutional infringement on Texans' voting rights. A hearing is scheduled for Friday, May 15, in San Antonio on a TDP motion for an expedited injunction enabling voting by mail for all Texas voters while blocking A.G. Paxton from further prosecution threats against election officials and Texas voters.

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for almost 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

Support the Chronicle  

More elections
Austin Election Ticker: The Endorsements Begin
Austin Election Ticker: The Endorsements Begin
Delia Garza's Twitter tangle, Central Labor Council likes, and more

Michael King, Jan. 17, 2020

Local and State Election Ticker
Local and State Election Ticker
Mamas Walking, Mamas Voting Edition

Michael King, Jan. 3, 2020

More by Michael King
Fifth Circuit Extends Its Vote-By-Mail Order
5th Circuit Blocks VBM
Panel Says State Will Likely Prevail Against VBM Expansion

June 5, 2020

Voting By Mail? The Decision Is Yours.
Voting By Mail? The Decision Is Yours.
Texas Supreme Court rejects Paxton writ of mandamus, leaves VBM to voter

June 5, 2020


elections, vote by mail, election fraud, July 2020 Elections, Ken Paxton, Tim Sulak, John Creuzot, Kendall Scudder, Woot Lervisit, Texas Democratic Party

One click gets you all the newsletters listed below

Breaking news, arts coverage, and daily events

Can't keep up with happenings around town? We can help.

Austin's queerest news and events

New recipes and food news delivered Mondays

All questions answered (satisfaction not guaranteed)

Information is power. Support the free press, so we can support Austin.   Support the Chronicle