Anti-Abortionist and Heidi Group Founder Sues U.S. Government

Suit argues anti-choice and anti-LGBTQ groups with "sincere religious beliefs" deserve Title X money

Carol Everett

A Round Rock anti-abortion activist whose group's lucrative state contracts were withdrawn last year amid controversy has rebranded her operation; now, she's suing the U.S. government for a chance to take in federal family planning dollars. Carol Everett, founder of the Heidi Group crisis pregnancy center, was awarded $1.6 million in state funds to provide health care to low-income women in 2016-19. But with no actual health care experience (and a leader who once stated humans can "contract STDs and HIV through the water system" during a state public hearing) the Heidi Group fell severely short of the goals they promised to meet, seeing only about 2,000 out of a projected 50,000 clients. The Texas Health and Human Services Commission reduced the group's funding and then finally terminated its contracts in 2018, recovering about $29,000 in repayments and identifying another $1.1 million in questionable billed costs that may need to be reimbursed. The bungled mess elicited a call for investigations from Democrats and watchdog groups who questioned why such an unqualified and ideological group would receive taxpayers' money in the first place.

After the massive and very public failure, you'd think Ever­ett might retreat into the shadows. Instead, she created a new organization with two Heidi employees – Vita Nuova, Latin for "new life" – and sued the federal government a day later. The brazen attempt to win funds, initially reported by Politico, argues that anti-choice and anti-LGBTQ groups with "sincere religious beliefs" deserve Title X money – federal grants designated for health and family planning to low-income women. The suit follows the Trump administration's move to ban clinics that get Title X funds from referring patients to abortion care – that rule is in effect but being challenged in court.

Despite its anti-choice credentials, Vita Nuova says it can't get federal funding, and wants favors called in: HHS "requires all of its grant recipients to recognize same-sex marriage, and it provides no exemptions or accommodations for organizations (such as Vita Nuova) that oppose homosexual behavior for sincere religious reasons," the lawsuit reads. Dan Quinn of the Texas Freedom Network tells us the group is basically suing for the right to discriminate against LGBTQ people who come to them for services. "Talk about chutzpah," said Quinn. "They can change their name and create as many different organizations as they want, but neither the government nor the courts should force taxpayers to fund this toxic brew of incompetence and discrimination."

Speaking of anti-choice groups and questionable contracts, 80 state GOP lawmakers penned a letter to HHSC requesting the agency increase Alternatives to Abortion program funding to the Texas Pregnancy Care Network without considering other bidders, reports The Texas Tribune. TPCN oversees a network of crisis pregnancy centers, and as the main contractor in the A2A program, has already received millions from the state since 2006. Legislators this past session allocated $60 million, and potentially more, to the A2A program, which has been criticized for its lack of transparency, accountability, and measurable benefits from its generous subsidies to CPCs, whose mission is to deter women from abortion while offering few actual health services. (Everett's Heidi Group received thousands from the A2A program in the past.)

Reps. Donna Howard, D-Austin, and Sarah Davis, R-West University Place, shot back with their own letter urging HHSC to stick to state law and follow through with a competitive bidding process. In a response obtained by the Chronicle, HHSC claims they'll try to do so. "As we develop and implement plans for the next biennium for the Alternatives to Abortion program, be assured that HHSC will steward the Legislature's significantly increased investment in this program wisely, growing it in fiscally responsible ways that are consistent with our policies and state law and remain true to the program's founding purpose."

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for almost 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

Support the Chronicle  

More Reproductive Rights
Paxton Thinks Abortion Providers Get a
Paxton Thinks Abortion Providers Get a "Pass" in Court
A.G. urges SCOTUS to make it harder for providers to fight anti-choice laws

Mary Tuma, July 5, 2019

The Toll Anti-Choice Laws Have on Real Lives
The Toll Anti-Choice Laws Have on Real Lives
UT researcher interviewed 603 women about the barriers facing abortion care in Texas

Mary Tuma, June 21, 2019

More by Mary Tuma
Council Members To Back Abortion Support Budget Measure
CMs Plan To Support Abortion Funds
Garza, Casar plan support for $100K in abortion assistance

Aug. 15, 2019

Texas Rangers Get Wrangled Into
Texas Rangers Get Wrangled Into "Bonnenghazi" Drama
Scandal surrounding House Speaker Dennis Bonnen burns on

Aug. 16, 2019


Reproductive Rights, Carol Everett, Heidi Group, The Texas Health and Human Services Commission, Title X, Vita Nuova, Dan Quinn, Texas Freedom Network, Anti-LGBTQ, Alternatives to Abortion program funding, Texas Pregnancy Care Network, Donna Howard, Sarah Davis

One click gets you all the newsletters listed below

Breaking news, arts coverage, and daily events

Can't keep up with happenings around town? We can help.

Austin's queerest news and events

Updates for SXSW 2019

All questions answered (satisfaction not guaranteed)

Time to vote! Best of Austin 2019 balloting is underway   VOTE NOW