5th Circuit Upholds Voter ID Law

Requirements will stay in place for now

5th Circuit Upholds Voter ID Law

According to the conservative U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, Texas' voter ID law – deemed intentionally discriminatory by a lower federal court – is perfectly fine as currently structured. In a victory for state officials hoping to further marginalize the Democratic vote, a three-judge panel last Friday ruled that the changes legislators made in 2017 to fix the controversial 2011 law were successful.

The updated law forces voters without any of the seven approved forms of ID to sign an affidavit; provide another ID via documents like a utility bill, bank statement, or paycheck; and promise that a "reasonable impediment" prevented them from obtaining legal ID. If they are caught lying about that impediment, they could face jail time, which you can imagine creates a possible chilling effect on voters. In August, Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos said the revised law fell short of actually remedying the problem and described it as a "poll tax" on indigent and minority voters. The state appealed, sending it to the 5th Circuit. Judge Edith Jones wrote the majority opinion, praising the changes and downplaying or brushing away racially motivated intent. The district court "overlooked SB 5's improvements for disadvantaged minority voters and neither sought evidence on nor made any finding that the Texas legislature in 2017 intentionally discriminated when enacting SB 5," she wrote. Her opinion comes as no surprise as Jones previously wrote a scathing dissent when her 5th Circuit colleagues found the original law to be in violation of the Voting Rights Act in 2016.

The 2-1 decision in Veasey v. Abbott claimed one lively dissent, from Obama appointee James Graves Jr., who had some colorful words for the law: "A hog in a silk waistcoat is still a hog." Graves, who's black, called the law an "unconstitutional disenfranchisement of duly qualified electors" and said "SB 5 is merely its adorned alter ego."

Civil rights groups suing the state can still appeal the ruling and request a case review, or appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, which is currently mulling over Texas' redistricting maps – yet another tangled and discriminatory Texas policy.

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for almost 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

Support the Chronicle  

More Voter ID
Lege Lines: Deliberately Discriminatory
Lege Lines: Deliberately Discriminatory
Voter ID's future in Texas, without the DoJ

Richard Whittaker, March 3, 2017

Protest Votes Under Scrutiny
Protest Votes Under Scrutiny
Over 16,400 Texans signed an affidavit in order to vote

Richard Whittaker, Feb. 24, 2017

More by Mary Tuma
ACLU Sues Texas Cities Over Local Abortion Bans
ACLU Sues Texas Cities Over Local Abortion Bans
Suit argues small towns aim to suppress truth, free speech

Feb. 26, 2020

Democratic Frontrunner Bernie Sanders Energizes Crowd at Austin Rally
Democratic Frontrunner Bernie Sanders Energizes Crowd at Austin Rally
Sanders voices “absolute confidence” his campaign will win Texas

Feb. 24, 2020


November 2018 Election, Voter ID, Nelva Gonzales Ramos, Edith Jones, James Graves

One click gets you all the newsletters listed below

Breaking news, arts coverage, and daily events

Can't keep up with happenings around town? We can help.

Austin's queerest news and events

Updates for SXSW 2019

All questions answered (satisfaction not guaranteed)

Information is power. Support the free press, so we can support Austin.   Support the Chronicle