SCOTUS Hears Texas Redistricting

Gerrymandering of congressional and state maps currently at high court


Are Texas' electoral maps racist? The U.S. Supreme Court will decide. On Tuesday, SCOTUS heard arguments in Abbott v. Perez, the state's redistricting case, a long and tangled saga that began in 2011. The state is appealing a lower court ruling that found legislative and congressional maps were drawn by lawmakers to intentionally discriminate against black and Hispanic voters and dilute their power. Among the congressional districts in question is Austin Rep. Lloyd Dog­gett's CD 35, which runs along I-35 between Aus­tin and San Antonio (and not much else). The outcome will mean Texas either keeps its discriminatory maps or is forced to redraw them, and possibly be subject to federal pre-clearance any time it wants to draw new districts.

Without court intervention, there's nothing stopping Republicans from creating new discriminatory maps after the 2020 census, notes Austin state Rep. Eddie Rodri­guez, a named plaintiff in the lawsuit. SCOTUS could also decide to punt the case to the lower court due to jurisdictional issues. According to media reports, the liberal justices on Tuesday appeared sympathetic toward the civil rights and minority groups contesting the map, while conservatives seemed to side with the state. It's anyone's guess how Justice Anthony Kennedy's decisive vote will swing. A final ruling is expected this summer.

Got something to say? The Chronicle welcomes opinion pieces on any topic from the community. Submit yours now at austinchronicle.com/opinion.

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for over 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

Support the Chronicle  

READ MORE
More November 2018 Election
<i>Chronicle</i> Endorsements
Chronicle Endorsements
Dec. 11 Run-Off Election; Early Voting Nov. 29-Dec. 7

The Chronicle Editorial Board, Nov. 23, 2018

Point Austin: The Work Goes On
Point Austin: The Work Goes On
A mixed election bag nationwide, but real reasons for optimism

Michael King, Nov. 9, 2018

More by Mary Tuma
Abortion Care Providers “Heartened” After SB 8 Hearing at SCOTUS
Abortion Care Providers “Heartened” After SB 8 Hearing at SCOTUS
Oral arguments focus on law’s vigilante enforcement

Nov. 5, 2021

Abortion Care Providers “Heartened” After SB 8 Hearing at SCOTUS
Abortion Care Providers “Heartened” After SB 8 Hearing at SCOTUS
Oral arguments focus on law’s vigilante enforcement

Nov. 1, 2021

KEYWORDS FOR THIS STORY

Lloyd Doggett, Eddie Rodriguez, November 2018 Election

MORE IN THE ARCHIVES
NEWSLETTERS
One click gets you all the newsletters listed below

Breaking news, arts coverage, and daily events

Can't keep up with happenings around town? We can help.

Austin's queerest news and events

Eric Goodman's Austin FC column, other soccer news

Behind the scenes at The Austin Chronicle

Information is power. Support the free press, so we can support Austin.   Support the Chronicle