One Court, Three Decisions

SCOTUS rules on three Texas cases impacting abortion, affirmative action, and immigration

One Court, Three Decisions
by Thinkstock

In a state where our governor (and former attorney general) jokes that he wakes up, goes to the office, and sues the federal government, it's really no wonder so many pivotal cases before the U.S. Supreme Court today emanate from Texas. With futures at stake, Texans have anxiously awaited influential decisions on abortion rights, immigration, and affirmative action. Leaving all three rulings to the final weeks of its term, SCOTUS put the anxiety to rest by dropping a trio of opinions that deeply impact some of Texas' most vulnerable – low-income women, immigrant workers, and students. In rulings to celebrate, justices upheld the University of Texas' right to employ affirmative action in its admissions and struck down two parts of Texas' onerous 2013 anti-abortion law, House Bill 2. However, it wasn't all progress: A 4-4 deadlock halted (for now) expanded protections for undocumented workers, a reminder of the GOP's anti-Obama obstructionism in selecting a ninth justice. Unless Senate Republicans yield and give current nominee Merrick Garland a hearing, there will be no more than eight justices when the court reconvenes on the first Monday in October – and the fallout from an understaffed court could continue well into the 2016-17 term. Mary Tuma

Got something to say on the subject? Send a letter to the editor.

Read more of the Chronicle's decades of reproductive rights reporting here.

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for over 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

Support the Chronicle  

READ MORE
More Supreme Court
Readings
Supreme Courtship
Christopher Buckley delivers some pretty spot-on satire of Beltway politics but misses the mark for humor

Jordan Smith, Sept. 12, 2008

Supremes Hear Texas Death Penalty Cases
Supremes Hear Texas Death Penalty Cases
Supreme Court grapples once again with whether Texas death penalty scheme – and the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals' interpretation of its role in deciding death penalty cases – meets constitutional requirements

Rita Radostitz, Jan. 26, 2007

More by Mary Tuma
Abortion Care Providers “Heartened” After SB 8 Hearing at SCOTUS
Abortion Care Providers “Heartened” After SB 8 Hearing at SCOTUS
Oral arguments focus on law’s vigilante enforcement

Nov. 5, 2021

Abortion Care Providers “Heartened” After SB 8 Hearing at SCOTUS
Abortion Care Providers “Heartened” After SB 8 Hearing at SCOTUS
Oral arguments focus on law’s vigilante enforcement

Nov. 1, 2021

More by Richard Whittaker
Life as a War Boy
Life as a War Boy
Dressing as Furiosa's most disposable characters

May 24, 2024

Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga
The story is lacking but the spectacle is stupendous

May 24, 2024

KEYWORDS FOR THIS STORY

Supreme Court, SCOTUS, abortion rights, immigration rights, affirmative action

MORE IN THE ARCHIVES
One click gets you all the newsletters listed below

Breaking news, arts coverage, and daily events

Keep up with happenings around town

Kevin Curtin's bimonthly cannabis musings

Austin's queerest news and events

Eric Goodman's Austin FC column, other soccer news

Information is power. Support the free press, so we can support Austin.   Support the Chronicle