One Court, Three Decisions

SCOTUS rules on three Texas cases impacting abortion, affirmative action, and immigration

One Court, Three Decisions
by Thinkstock

In a state where our governor (and former attorney general) jokes that he wakes up, goes to the office, and sues the federal government, it's really no wonder so many pivotal cases before the U.S. Supreme Court today emanate from Texas. With futures at stake, Texans have anxiously awaited influential decisions on abortion rights, immigration, and affirmative action. Leaving all three rulings to the final weeks of its term, SCOTUS put the anxiety to rest by dropping a trio of opinions that deeply impact some of Texas' most vulnerable – low-income women, immigrant workers, and students. In rulings to celebrate, justices upheld the University of Texas' right to employ affirmative action in its admissions and struck down two parts of Texas' onerous 2013 anti-abortion law, House Bill 2. However, it wasn't all progress: A 4-4 deadlock halted (for now) expanded protections for undocumented workers, a reminder of the GOP's anti-Obama obstructionism in selecting a ninth justice. Unless Senate Republicans yield and give current nominee Merrick Garland a hearing, there will be no more than eight justices when the court reconvenes on the first Monday in October – and the fallout from an understaffed court could continue well into the 2016-17 term. Mary Tuma

For more, check out our War on Women's Health page.

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for almost 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

Support the Chronicle  

More Supreme Court
Supreme Courtship
Christopher Buckley delivers some pretty spot-on satire of Beltway politics but misses the mark for humor

Jordan Smith, Sept. 12, 2008

Supremes Hear Texas Death Penalty Cases
Supremes Hear Texas Death Penalty Cases
Supreme Court grapples once again with whether Texas death penalty scheme – and the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals' interpretation of its role in deciding death penalty cases – meets constitutional requirements

Rita Radostitz, Jan. 26, 2007

More by Mary Tuma
Abortion Care Providers “Heartened” After SB 8 Hearing at SCOTUS
Abortion Care Providers “Heartened” After SB 8 Hearing at SCOTUS
Oral arguments focus on law’s vigilante enforcement

Nov. 5, 2021

Abortion Care Providers “Heartened” After SB 8 Hearing at SCOTUS
Abortion Care Providers “Heartened” After SB 8 Hearing at SCOTUS
Oral arguments focus on law’s vigilante enforcement

Nov. 1, 2021

More by Richard Whittaker
Making the Flowers Bloom in <i>Encanto</i>
Making the Flowers Bloom in Encanto
Austinite Jay Jackson talks about Disney's latest animated blossom

Nov. 24, 2021

House of Gucci
Ridley Scott is a bad fit for the tale of the fashion house's fall

Nov. 26, 2021


Supreme Court, SCOTUS, abortion rights, immigration rights, affirmative action

One click gets you all the newsletters listed below

Breaking news, arts coverage, and daily events

Can't keep up with happenings around town? We can help.

Austin's queerest news and events

Eric Goodman's Austin FC column, other soccer news

Information is power. Support the free press, so we can support Austin.   Support the Chronicle