Council Preview: A Bar on Burnet?!?

Neighbors aren't pleased with Little Woodrow's plan to move in

Laura Morrison (l) and Kathie Tovo were the two dissenting votes against a proposal for a new Little Woodrow's on Burnet Road.
Laura Morrison (l) and Kathie Tovo were the two dissenting votes against a proposal for a new Little Woodrow's on Burnet Road. (Photo by John Anderson)

City Hall is not quite up to 2013 speed just yet, but the next regular City Council meeting is Thursday, Jan. 17 (work session Jan. 15). Much of the preliminary agenda (finalized Jan. 11) is taken up with zoning matters – quite a few carried over from last year – notably the complex East Riverside Corridor Regulating Plan, hotly debated in November but now anticipated for adoption; as they say in all caps, THE PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED.

More likely to raise sand will be the hearing over the proposed Austin Hotel (Eighth and Congress), with dueling recommendations for a CBD-H-CURE zoning change, endorsed by city staff but rejected by the Planning Commission, and opposed as well by the Downtown Austin Alliance. (We'll have more on that case next week.)

Zoning, of course, is where citywide macropolicy collides with neighborhood micropolitics – with sparks often flying. In that vein, also returning, in theory for second and third readings, will be the Little Woodrow's bar and restaurant proposed for 5425 Burnet Rd., in a retro-Fifties building that is the former site of Nelson Puett Real Estate. (The sign's still there, but the business has long since moved up to Anderson Lane.) The case – whether to grant "CS-1" zoning, thus enabling a bar – occasioned two hours of heated discussion at last year's final meeting, Dec. 13. Both staff and the Planning Commission recommended approval (the latter by a daunting 9-0), although with the understanding that various operating matters (parking requirements, street design, etc.) would return for conditional use permits.

Council wasn't so sure – on first reading, the zoning passed only 4-2, Laura Morrison and Kathie Tovo dissenting – concurring with nearby neighborhood associations (Brent­wood, Allandale) that objected primarily that the venue will be a late-night bar thinly disguised as a restaurant. Leaseholder Rick Engel (in addition to four Little Woodrow's, Engel owns Austin Java, Uncle Billy's, and Ski Shores) insisted that he's a good neighbor and that this venue would be an unobjectionable restaurant-cum-public-house in keeping with the Burnet commercial corridor. The neighbors say it walks, talks, and quacks like a bar, and would bring traffic, noise, congestion, and crime to nearby residential streets.

The NAs hadn't quite accumulated enough signatures to constitute a valid opposing petition in December – whether the intervening weeks have altered that math remains to be seen. Other than Tovo and Morrison, Council members mostly wondered about sufficient off-street parking. That's a question partly to be determined in the CU permit process, and as Bill Spelman summed up resignedly, "I can tell we're going to see it again anyway."

He was speaking of the coming CU process – which almost certainly recircles via the Planning Commission to Council, on appeal by either side – but he might have been talking about Jan. 17: the return of Little Woodrow's.

Got something to say on the subject? Send a letter to the editor.

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for over 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

Support the Chronicle  

More City Council
Who Will Be the New Council Voice for District 9?
Who Will Be the New Council Voice for District 9?
Eight candidates vie for Austin's most powerful YIMBYs and NIMBYs

Austin Sanders, Oct. 28, 2022

Can Council Get Its Sh*t Done by 10pm?
Can Council Get Its Sh*t Done by 10pm?
Austin City Council addresses a 93-item agenda Sept. 15 and aims to end by 10pm rather than voting to extend the meeting

Austin Sanders, Sept. 16, 2022

More by Michael King
Point Austin: The Never-Ending Story
Point Austin: The Never-Ending Story
Millions of guns, and countless murders

Feb. 20, 2024

Paxton’s Impeachment Circus Continues Into 2024
Paxton’s Impeachment Circus Continues Into 2024
Dan Patrick’s denunciation of the House decision to impeach confirms entire trial was tilted in Paxton’s favor

Dec. 15, 2023


City Council, Little Woodrow's, East Riverside, East Riverside Corridor Regulating Plan, Austin Hotel, Nelson Puett Real Estate, zoning, Allandale, Brentwood

One click gets you all the newsletters listed below

Breaking news, arts coverage, and daily events

Keep up with happenings around town

Kevin Curtin's bimonthly cannabis musings

Austin's queerest news and events

Eric Goodman's Austin FC column, other soccer news

Information is power. Support the free press, so we can support Austin.   Support the Chronicle