Point Austin: One More Time

On the seventh try, can we change city government?

Point Austin: One More Time

I was at home on Sunday night, minding my own business, when I was surveyed by phone on my opinions on geographic districts for Austin City Council members. (And you think you lead an exciting life.) I don't know who sponsored or performed the computerized survey, but it seemed fairly thorough and straightforward – not obviously a push-poll – with a series of "If ... then" questions designed to elicit my general opinion on districting and how likely I would be to vote on the currently competing plans (pure districting or "10-1" vs. a "hybrid" plan with some at-large seats). In that spirit, I answered the questions as best as I could – yet as a result, I'm not sure the surveyors (if they did have a partisan interest) got their money's worth.

Following the various proposed scenarios – the advantages of at-large representation of the whole city, the empowerment of neighborhoods under districting, the ability to vote for more than one rep under a mixed system, the presumed broader citizen engagement under districting – I'm pretty sure I came down very firmly on both sides. Pushing the requisite buttons, depending on the question, at one point or another I endorsed both the all-district and hybrid systems. I don't know if that makes me an ideal poll subject or just another Austin voter who can't make up his mind.

For the sake of argument, I'll claim the latter – and I suspect many of my neighbors will be in the same boat come November, when it looks increasingly likely that both options will be on the ballot: a 10-1 scenario generated by public petition, and a hybrid system proposed by the City Council. Matters may come to a head today (Thursday), as Council is set to consider both an 8-2-1 system proposed by Mayor Lee Leffingwell and Chris Riley, and a 10-1 proposal sponsored by Mike Martinez and Sheryl Cole.

DIY Legislating

The council chewed on the matter at length during its Tuesday work session, without moving toward any obvious conclusion. Indeed, based on scheduling questions to staff, it seemed likely they would leave a ballot resolution hanging until August, with just enough time to get the wording right for early voting. That's no small issue, since there are several other election reform proposals pending – moving elections from May to November, tighter campaign finance regulation, and so on – and it takes time to make certain the ballot language is accurate and legal.

Four members, a de facto majority – Lef­fing­well, Riley, Morrison, and Tovo – appear to be leaning toward a hybrid, although they may differ on details. That leaves Bill Spelman not showing his cards, suggesting only that his vote will depend on whether the petitioners led by Austinites for Geographic Representation – a very motley crew – succeed in gathering sufficient signatures. Martinez says he will withdraw his own 10-1 plan if AGR does so, arguing that should 25,000 to 30,000 citizens sign on to 10-1, it's only right to give them a shot on the ballot.

But the AGR plan is accompanied by a strenuously complicated plan (derived from California state law) for an independent districting commission, some of which is legally dubious and all of which mocks the notion that petition signers had time to seriously review what they were signing. (Legislation by petition is a subject for another day – suffice to say that compared to even poor representative government, it's a farce.) Crammed chockablock into the charter, it would be a difficult to revise legal and political minefield, and it weighs down the AGR plan like a lawyer's dead case file.

More to the immediate point, it will give voters otherwise willing to give 10-1 a try a major reason to think twice – and one more roadblock to Austin's perennial search for more equitable representation.

Been There, Undone That

There are virtues and flaws to both proposed systems, but if, as seems likely, both land on the ballot, it will be much more difficult to pass either one. As is inevitable, positions are hardening – at his inauguration this week, the mayor described 10-1 as going "from bad to worse" and plenty of the 10-1 supporters have long since staked out an all-or-nothing absolutism. This week a new group surfaced, founded by members the Char­ter Revision Committee, and calling itself Austin Community for Change – they've issued a report defending a hybrid as a "unifying choice," both more flexible and better for minority groups not geographically concentrated.

Maybe so. They've come to the party late, although they reflect the fact that the CRC itself was split down the middle between 10-1 hardliners (anchored by His­panics understandably impatient at underrepresentation) and those looking for a variation that 1) might provide broader representation and 2) stands a better chance of actually being passed by the voters. It's hard to forget those six earlier attempts at getting this done, going back to the early Seventies, every one of which went down in defeat.

Well, here we are again. Want to place any bets?

Download the Austinites for Geographic Representation petition, and the Austin Community for Change report, "Fair Today Fair Tomorrow."

Follow Michael King on Twitter @PointAustin.

Got something to say on the subject? Send a letter to the editor.

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for over 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

Support the Chronicle  

More City government
Boards & Commissions Mix-and-Match
Boards & Commissions Mix-and-Match
The city tries to consolidate its committees

Chase Hoffberger, Aug. 1, 2014

Point Austin: Uncivil Service
Point Austin: Uncivil Service
City management panics at the thought of workers' rights

Aug. 31, 2012

More City Council
Who Will Be the New Council Voice for District 9?
Who Will Be the New Council Voice for District 9?
Eight candidates vie for Austin's most powerful YIMBYs and NIMBYs

Austin Sanders, Oct. 28, 2022

Can Council Get Its Sh*t Done by 10pm?
Can Council Get Its Sh*t Done by 10pm?
Austin City Council addresses a 93-item agenda Sept. 15 and aims to end by 10pm rather than voting to extend the meeting

Austin Sanders, Sept. 16, 2022

More Point Austin
Point Austin: So Long, It’s Been Good to Know Ya
Point Austin: So Long, It’s Been Good to Know Ya
After a couple of decades … bidding farewell

Michael King, March 27, 2020

Point Austin: Future Outcomes Not Assured
Point Austin: Future Outcomes Not Assured
Super Tuesday’s first-round results leave plenty of unanswered questions

Michael King, March 13, 2020


City government, City Council, Austinites for Geographic Representation, Austin Community for Change, single-member districts

One click gets you all the newsletters listed below

Breaking news, arts coverage, and daily events

Keep up with happenings around town

Kevin Curtin's bimonthly cannabis musings

Austin's queerest news and events

Eric Goodman's Austin FC column, other soccer news

Information is power. Support the free press, so we can support Austin.   Support the Chronicle