Supremes Wink at Titty Tax

Constitutionality of less-than-lucrative tax at issue

Supremes Wink at Titty Tax
Illustration by Jason Stout

There will be no Lone Star strippers in D.C. after the U.S Supreme Court decided it will not review Texas' "pole tax." On Jan. 23 the court announced that it would not consider the latest challenge by the Texas Entertainment Association to the $5 per customer surcharge on bars with nude dancing. However, the case is far from concluded. When District Court Judge Scott Jenkins initially ruled the tax unconstitutional almost four years ago (see "Topless Tax Terminated," April 4, 2008), he ruled only on its potential First Amend­ment violations. Neither he, nor the Texas Supreme Court that overturned his ruling, considered whether it flouts the Texas Constitution. TEA attorney Stewart Whitehead said the case now returns to Jenkins' court to handle those issues. However, there may be a new delay, since almost all the staff members who handled the original trial have left the Attorney General's Office. Once he knows who will be representing the state, Whitehead said, "We'll probably set up a status conference with Judge Jenkins to see where we go next." The surcharge itself has been a complete bust. Proponents, who argued it would aid the state's dramatically underfunded sexual assault programs, claimed it would raise $40 million a year; it has actually produced a fraction of that, and none of it can be spent until the legal wrangling is complete, just in case the state loses and has to return that money to the businesses.

Got something to say? The Chronicle welcomes opinion pieces on any topic from the community. Submit yours now at austinchronicle.com/opinion.

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for almost 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

Support the Chronicle  

READ MORE
More SCOTUS
Qmmunity: Trump Admin Could Soon Undermine Health Care Protections for LGBTQIA
Qmmunity: Trump Admin Could Soon Undermine Health Care Protections for LGBTQIA
Find queer connection with virtual events

Beth Sullivan, May 1, 2020

Louisiana SCOTUS Case Déjà Vu for Texas Abortion Providers
Louisiana SCOTUS Case Déjà Vu for Texas Abortion Providers
Conservative 5th Circuit ignores Whole Woman’s precedent

Mary Tuma, Oct. 25, 2019

More by Richard Whittaker
The Mitchells vs. the Machines
Joy-filled animated family SF comedy is an explosion of fun

Jan. 14, 2022

Shattered
Unerotic and unthrilling home invasion flick is seriously unsubtle

Jan. 14, 2022

KEYWORDS FOR THIS STORY

SCOTUS, pole tax, titty tax, Supreme Court of the United States, First Amendment, Texas Entertainment Association, Scott Jenkins

MORE IN THE ARCHIVES
NEWSLETTERS
One click gets you all the newsletters listed below

Breaking news, arts coverage, and daily events

Can't keep up with happenings around town? We can help.

Austin's queerest news and events

Eric Goodman's Austin FC column, other soccer news

Behind the scenes at The Austin Chronicle

Information is power. Support the free press, so we can support Austin.   Support the Chronicle