Should AE Retire Fayette Coal Plant ... This Decade?
By Nora Ankrum, Fri., Nov. 20, 2009
Should AE Retire FPP by 2020?
Supporters Say:
• Protection from costs of regulation on CO2 and other pollutants
• Savings on fuel cost
• Significantly smaller carbon footprint
• Fewer pollutants (including zero mercury and sulfur dioxide emissions)
• Healthier Texans and decreased spending on pollution-related health problems
• Leaner operation-and-maintenance costs (no more upkeep of old technology)
• More local green jobs/lower bills due to increased reliance on weatherization, rooftop solar, etc.
• Austin keeps energy leadership cred
• Greater potential to buy power from market more cheaply than AE can produce it*
Opponents Say:
• More dependence on variable sources of power and market prices
• Overreliance on assumptions about carbon legislation that may not pass
• Higher capital investments required up front
• Potential for the Electric Reliability Council of Texas – or other legal/regulatory unknowns – to prevent AE from retiring the plant*
• Not enough transmission to carry wind power from West Texas if build-out goes more slowly than expected
• Potential loss of opportunity to recoup costs from recent upgrades (e.g., scrubbers)*
• Overambitious reliance on private investment in rooftop solar, energy efficiency, etc.*
• Not necessarily enough solar panels to meet demand*
Should AE Sell FPP?
Supporters Say:
• More money to spend on transition to renewables
• Potential to supplant new construction
Opponents Say:
• Lost opportunity to reduce CO2 and other pollutants
• Unacceptable health risks
• Potential for AE to have to purchase Fayette's power at a higher price
Got something to say on the subject? Send a letter to the editor.