AE Defends Biomass Plant
Biomass likely to go forward despite some public opposition
AE Chief Operating Officer Mike McCluskey on Tuesday addressed criticisms over the haste with which the deal was introduced to the public (first appearing on an Aug. 7 council agenda). "We've always talked about needing solar, biomass, and wind," with respect to the city's renewable goals, he said, explaining that the citizen-volunteer Resource Management and Electric Utility commissions were advised of the deal in executive session last spring (both of those commissions ultimately recommended the deal). He also explained that rising construction-material prices only allowed Nacogdoches Power to offer the city a price for the month of August, after finalizing contract terms on July 18 of this year.
McCluskey stood behind utility estimates that the project would raise customer rates no more than $2.50 per month, and could in fact cut rates by $1.50. He also allayed concerns over the availability of the plant's fuel supply, saying Nacogdoches Power expects to have the first 10 years of wood-waste fuel under contract and that economics make subsequent competition for the fuel very unlikely.
Asked why the city chose to negotiate directly with Nacogdoches Power, as opposed to opening the biomass contract to competitive bidding (which some observers claim state law requires), McCluskey said, "Nacogdoches Power was the only game in town." He said that in terms of scale and readiness to break ground, "they were the only ones we were aware of who could've bid this project to us." He also explained that the city lost multiple opportunities to buy power following a 2005 open bid for renewable energy after taking too long to negotiate contracts, leading AE to favor direct negotiations with one firm.
Council Member Lee Leffingwell at last week's meeting said that we need this 100 megawatts of power by 2013. "It is a choice of either renewable energy, natural gas-powered energy, or coal energy," he said. "I think the pros so heavily outweigh the cons that the action we need to take is very clear." (For more, see "Biomass: A Question of Wood, Not Could," Aug. 22.)