Who's Responsible for the Littlefield Spill?

City and state hunting through archives to work out who will foot bill

If it were 1910, Maj. George Littlefield would be digging deep to pay to clean Jan­u­ary's oil leak out of Waller Creek. But now, in 2008, the city of Austin and the Texas Com­mission on Environmental Quality are hunting through archives to work out who will foot the bill.

On Jan. 10, a water main in the back alley between the Littlefield Building and the Driskill Hotel on Sixth Street burst and flushed through an abandoned underground storage tank. About 4,000 gallons of fuel oil were washed down to Waller Creek, where it was contained before it could contaminate Lady Bird Lake or the wetlands on its north shore. This left the city with a $220,000 cleanup bill, and staffers have been trying to work out who has to pay for it.

Staff found council minutes from 1910 permitting Littlefield to install the tank for his new building. But that doesn't necessarily mean the current owners, Austin Littlefield LP, are liable for the cleanup costs. That decision of culpability is up to TCEQ. "We turned all the records over to the state, and they'll be identifying the responsible party," said Nancy McClin­tock, assistant director for the city's Watershed Protection and Development Review Department. There's also the question of who has to pay to fix the back alley. While the tank has been purged and filled, the alley is still closed off, with waterproof sheeting covering the filled trench. Under a 1929 law, the city has an easement on the alley, but it belongs to the building owners, and McClin­tock says all parties are eager to reopen it.

That doesn't mean everything is necessarily clean. The recent heavy rains seem to have flushed out most of any remaining traces of the leakage. But the geology of Downtown Austin – mostly absorbent limestone – could hide some surprises holding some pockets of pollution: "In an urban area, you can have a lot of aggregate," McClintock said. So far, staffers are optimistic there will be no more environmental damage.

"We're watching Waller Creek to see if there will be any long-term impact, but we've been pleasantly surprised so far," she added.

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for over 36 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

Support the Chronicle  

READ MORE
More Waller Creek
Waller Creek Comes to Life
Waller Creek Comes to Life
Conservancy seeks radical makeover east of Downtown

Robyn Ross, Nov. 13, 2015

Going With the Flow
Going With the Flow
The next life of Waller Creek

Ari Phillips, Jan. 11, 2013

More by Richard Whittaker
Other Worlds Austin Hits <i>The Dead Center</i>
Other Worlds Austin Hits The Dead Center
SF and horror film fest adds centerpiece film and more

Oct. 20, 2018

Into the Night With Joe Taslim and Timo Tjahjanto
FF 2018: The Night Comes For Us
Indonesian action flick The Night Comes For Us pulls no punches

Oct. 19, 2018

KEYWORDS FOR THIS STORY

Waller Creek, Texas Com­mission on Environmental Quality, Littlefield Building, Driskill Hotel, Nancy McClin­tock, Watershed Protection and Development Review Department

MORE IN THE ARCHIVES
NEWSLETTERS
One click gets you all the newsletters listed below

Breaking news, arts coverage, and daily events

Can't keep up with happenings around town? We can help.

Austin's queerest news and events

Updates for SXSW 2019

All questions answered (satisfaction not guaranteed)

Information is power. Support the free press, so we can support Austin.   Support the Chronicle