Partial Nekkidness and the New 'Nudity' Tax

Big "gray area" in sexually oriented businesses-fee law

On June 2, 1986, back when they performed wearing nothing more than a strategically placed sport sock, the Red Hot Chili Peppers played the T-Bird Riverfest in Austin. If they were to play that gig in 2008, the sock-only attire would mean the promoters would have to phone the state comptroller to see if they owed $5 in fees for every concertgoer.

Such performances are falling into what R.J. DeSilva, spokesman for the comptroller, called a "gray area," where businesses may have been liable for the new fee on sexually oriented businesses since the beginning of the year. On Jan. 4, the comptroller published its enforcement guidelines for the fee: On p.65 of the latest 357-page edition of the Texas Register and described in the table of contents only as "Tax Administration 34 TAC §3.722," these are the rules that show taxpayers and tax collectors who must pay. As introduced under House Bill 1751 last session, the fee was only supposed to affect the state's 168 strip clubs. But these guidelines confirm the state may potentially collect from any venue that allows drinking and has performers with clothing not sufficiently opaque around the breasts, buttocks, or genitals, such as burlesques or experimental theatres.

The guidelines clarify collection and reporting methods but do little to reduce concerns over how broadly they could be applied. They give one specific example: If a bar held a wet T-shirt contest, the venue would be liable for the surcharge for that night. There wouldn't have to be nudity, just a see-through top. But before the rules were published, tax policy division manager Bryant Lomax was asked whether a theatrical or musical performance with nudity would be liable for the surcharge and said, "I have to say they would."

The rules would not apply in the case of a "wardrobe malfunction," and DeSilva said that, while he cannot cite specific examples, he believes there would be some businesses not covered. "In any tax issues, there are gray areas," he said. If a venue is unsure whether it would be liable, it should contact the tax policy division in advance. He encouraged public feedback during the 30-day consultation exercise, which ends Feb. 3, even though businesses may find that they've already been liable since Jan. 1. DeSilva did throw out one lifeline, however: A venue has to have both nudity and alcohol to pay up. So if you're showing nipples, close the bar, and make sure no one is packing a hip flask.

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for almost 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

Support the Chronicle  

More nudity tax
Return of the Titty Tax
Return of the Titty Tax
New 'nudity' tax could include not just strip clubs but cabarets, bars, fashion shows, and even mainstream theatres

Richard Whittaker, Dec. 7, 2007

More by Richard Whittaker
Living With Dying in <i>Our Friend</i>
Living With Dying in Our Friend
Gabriela Cowperthwaite on her film's responsibility to the truth

Jan. 20, 2021

Bears Rebecca Fonté Joins aGLIFF as Artistic Director
Bears Rebecca Fonté Joins aGLIFF as Artistic Director
Festival rebranding as PRISM for new era

Jan. 14, 2021


nudity tax, State Comptroller, R.J. DeSilva, Bryant Lomax

One click gets you all the newsletters listed below

Breaking news, arts coverage, and daily events

Can't keep up with happenings around town? We can help.

Austin's queerest news and events

New recipes and food news delivered Mondays

All questions answered (satisfaction not guaranteed)

Information is power. Support the free press, so we can support Austin.   Support the Chronicle