@ Chronic: Campaign Karl

Is his rep as the campaign killer still intact?

Can Karl Rove really help any Republican seeking elected office? Getting past the association with the Bush administration that most GOP presidential candidates are trying to avoid, is his rep as the campaign killer still intact?

During the '06 election, Chronic happened to be talking to a well-placed GOP campaign insider (and not some local apparatchik, either), and he (yeah, that's the only clue you're getting) recounted the story of the poll numbers. He had seen the gloomy internal Republican poll numbers, the ones that turned out to be surprisingly accurate (i.e., that they'd lose Congress). However, Rove was wandering around, pooh-poohing that data and saying he had his own research that showed a sunnier, Bushier future. "You have your numbers," he would say, "but I have the numbers."

What raised some eyebrows among the party operatives was that no one seemingly ever got to see those mythical numbers. Which meant either he was making up numbers for internal consumption (a trust-breaking cardinal sin among electioneers) or his radar was way off. Either way, it raised questions about whether he was a good campaign man anymore – because defending an incumbent and winning an all-bets-off race are totally different ball games.

Of course, he's as well-known for his attack-dog tactics and "schoolboy fun" approach to electioneering (also what was known in the Nixon era as rat-fucking). However, that was always done through proxies and cats' paws (allegedly), so going on Rush Limbaugh's radio show and MSNBC's Meet the Press to go after Hillary Clinton scarcely seems like the backstage manipulator of old.

Posted Monday, Aug. 20, at austinchronicle.com/chronic.

Got something to say? The Chronicle welcomes opinion pieces on any topic from the community. Submit yours now at austinchronicle.com/opinion.

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for over 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

Support the Chronicle  

READ MORE
More Chronic
@Chronic
@Chronic
Sciencing Be Hard

Richard Whittaker, Oct. 5, 2007

More by Richard Whittaker
Thor: Love and Thunder
The Slayer of Thanos becomes a lovesick clown in this mirthless sequel

July 8, 2022

Poser
Arthouse Single White Female is more form than concept

July 8, 2022

KEYWORDS FOR THIS STORY

Chronic, Karl Rove, Bush, Politics, Hillary Clinton

MORE IN THE ARCHIVES
NEWSLETTERS
One click gets you all the newsletters listed below

Breaking news, arts coverage, and daily events

Can't keep up with happenings around town? We can help.

Austin's queerest news and events

Eric Goodman's Austin FC column, other soccer news

Behind the scenes at The Austin Chronicle

Information is power. Support the free press, so we can support Austin.   Support the Chronicle