The problem with postindustrial design nicely exemplified by the current municipal fascination with redeveloping Downtown's southwestern waterfront is that infrastructure like the decommissioned Seaholm Power Plant and the Thomas C. Green Water Treatment Plant weren't conceived in anticipation of underground parking, faux-bohemian coffee shops, or coordination with the latest IKEA collection. They were designed for efficient, incessant, and sometimes brutal industrial use: intense electrical generation and churning pools of treated water, not an idealized facsimile of urban life. Would you have longed to live in Seaholm while those massive turbines whirred? By that standard, the residents of Holly Street have lived the concrete-floored dreams of Downtown's denizens for decades.
So we shouldn't be surprised when the redevelopment process takes longer than expected it's not like the last tenant was Old Navy. This was the unwelcome word to City Council last week, as staff announced that the decommission and demolition of Green WTP would be delayed by 15 months from November 2008 to February 2010. Officials cited several reasons: stabilizing the neighboring bank along Shoal Creek, moving massive underground infrastructure, and other environmental problems, "an incredible amount of logistical and physical challenges," said Mayor Will Wynn.
Despite grimaces on the dais, council still dreamt big, tossing up ideas of what they want on the four-block plot. Bridging Second Street across Shoal Creek connecting Green to the pending Seaholm development topped the wish list, the extension costing as much as $11 million on top of Green's current $27.5 million price tag. Seaholm continued to shadow the conversation, with Brewster McCracken floating a trial balloon locating the $90 million new central library sold as the centerpiece of Green's redevelopment instead on the former electric substation west of Shoal Creek. (That wouldn't have anything to do with Green's four quadrants being unencumbered by Capitol-view corridor restrictions, could it? At least council announced it would abide by waterfront overlay ordinances on the tracts mighty white of them!)
There also came the question of what the library would ultimately look like. McCracken called for developers to present two designs one positing the library as a stand-alone building, the other incorporating a vertical mixed-use design (i.e., other uses). Lee Leffingwell disagreed; noting that the $90 million bond only covers the first phase of library build-out, he said its initial incompletion "makes it almost unfeasible that it would be a mixed-use building of any kind." (The band of library supporters present, not longing to file Starbucks under the Dewey DS, applauded.) The meeting ended as Laura Huffman recited council's plans back to them the substation, differing designs, Wynn's idea of underground parking spanning Green's quadrants, and Jennifer Kim's insistence on local tenants in Green storefronts. The Gap Water Treatment Plant? No thanks.
We'd normally give this type of tripe the attention it deserves absolutely none but the repeatedly discredited yet ever-resilient "broken windows" notion of policing is back again, inevitably, this budget season. If the city's financial forecast is indeed as dire as we've been assured, then further prioritizing small-bore property crime like graffiti which already has its own full-time detective is ludicrous. As for homelessness, it'll only be addressed by continued outreach, smart city policy, and truly affordable housing not by unleashing the hobo gestapo every time a failed City Council candidate's stoop is shat upon.
Excuse the hoary expression, but shit happens.
Copyright © 2022 Austin Chronicle Corporation. All rights reserved.