Beside The Point

Three-Part (Dis) Harmony?

According to many armchair numerologists, evil comes in triplicate: Take City Council's three-fer meetings in the Concordia zoning saga. Developers East Avenue IG seek to transform the property which currently houses the sleepy, private Concordia University into what they call a miniature Downtown, and surrounding residents were rightfully concerned about the prospect of increased density and traffic. We've heard of negotiations going down to the wire, but this one hurtled toward it, tripped, and fell forward half a week.

East Avenue, represented by Austin's answer to Snidely Whiplash, real estate attorney Richard Suttle of Armbrust & Brown, hammered out last-second changes with the Hancock Neighborhood Association just minutes before the third and final zoning hearing at Thursday's council meeting. Requiring more attention than a cursory BlackBerry scroll, council took the rare step of recessing its meeting until 1:30pm the following day, Friday, with the hope that all would be ironed out. But the wrinkles wouldn't come out in the wash – after Friday's hour and a half of questions and testimony, it was apparent HNA wasn't yet comfortable with what East Avenue proposed in exchange for its desired PUD zoning. (PUD, or Planned Unit Development zoning, was – at least until the Concordia controversy – the preferred process for large-scale projects.) So the gang returned again, Monday (in a barely there quorum of five) to enact the PUD into posterity.

Katherine Gregor covers the push-and-pull more extensively today in "Developing Stories": how, after a tortured series of starts and stops, the ultimate negotiation model at Concordia – facilitation by a third party, in this case Downtown master-planners ROMA Design Group – may become the "best practices" standard for future PUD planning. But that's only after dragging the neighbors through hell – initially bereft of any resources, the working families of the neighborhood were expected to learn the arcane ins and outs of floor-to-area ratios and parkland dedication and negotiate private covenants with pros like Suttle. Hancock reps told council that one neighbor became so involved in the project he lost his job.

Noting the fight the neighbors were thrust into, Brewster McCracken said "our PUD process is broken … our current way of doing business is broken if we don't want to have a city that looks like California with a $400,000 housing average." (You always know what talking point McCracken has just acquired, because, like kids with shiny new curse words, he'll repeat it incessantly. Here entered the $400,000 entry into the Cali market – frightening, but judging from the affordability grumbles at East Avenue, all too possible.) With that, he promised a more formalized PUD process he and Mike Martinez are bringing forward; similarly, Sheryl Cole trumpeted the parkland dedication process for developers she has in the pipeline. The city shouldn't wait to pass these measures, along with the most important guideline – the affordable-housing task force recommendations, completing the triptych.

Martinez also announced formalizing the PUD process Thursday morning – of late, council has converted the opening minutes of each week's meeting into show and tell, when everyone on the dais trots out his or her latest endeavor. Aside from the PUD program and Cole's parkland program, Jennifer Kim discussed her recycling program for compact fluorescent bulbs – the city is encouraging use of the energy-efficient lights, but because they contain mercury, they must be properly disposed of. In other conservation news, Lee Leffingwell promised to present his water conservation task force findings next month. But nothing this week – council won't return until April 5. After three meetings in five days, they deserve a break.

Got something to say on the subject? Send a letter to the editor.

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for over 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

Support the Chronicle  

More Austin City Council
Council Recap: Making Life Easier for Child Care Centers
Council Recap: Making Life Easier for Child Care Centers
Council acts on resolution by CM Vanessa Fuentes

Austin Sanders, Feb. 3, 2023

Who Will Be the New Council Voice for District 9?
Who Will Be the New Council Voice for District 9?
Eight candidates vie for Austin's most powerful YIMBYs and NIMBYs

Austin Sanders, Oct. 28, 2022

More Beside the Point
Beside the Point: Referendum, Texas
Beside the Point: Referendum, Texas
Let’s vote on ... something, anything, and all of the time

Chase Hoffberger, July 20, 2018

Beside the Point: Represent, Represent
Beside the Point: Represent, Represent
County Commissioners consider the right form of indigent defense

Chase Hoffberger, April 27, 2018


Austin City Council, Concordia, PUD, East Avenue, Hancock Neighborhood Association, Richard Suttle, City Council, Brewster McCracken

One click gets you all the newsletters listed below

Breaking news, arts coverage, and daily events

Keep up with happenings around town

Kevin Curtin's bimonthly cannabis musings

Austin's queerest news and events

Eric Goodman's Austin FC column, other soccer news

Information is power. Support the free press, so we can support Austin.   Support the Chronicle