Dirty-Coal Reversal
TXU agrees to buy-out, announces it will abandon plans for eight of its proposed coal-fired plants
By Daniel Mottola, Fri., March 2, 2007
Ditch plans for eight of the 11 coal-fueled generation units, cutting 56 million tons of annual carbon emissions (according to TXU)
Terminate previous plans to expand coal operations in other states.
Endorse the U.S. Climate Action Partnership platform, including a call for a mandatory federal cap on carbon emissions.
Honor a previous agreement to reduce emissions of mercury, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen oxides by 20% from 2005 levels (previously contingent on the approval of all 11 plants)
Reduce the company's carbon emissions to 1990 levels by 2020.
Invest $400 million in demand-side management programs to cut energy consumption.
Double expenditures on energy efficiency measures and wind-power purchases.
Establish a Sustainable Energy Advisory Board, on which Environmental Defense's Jim Marston will serve.
Decrease by 10% the utility rate price for residential customers (though many energy experts and regulators feel rates should drop at least 30%).
TXU's turnaround was an "earthquake that happened in Texas, whose shockwave will be felt from Wall Street to Washington," said David Hawkins, director of the Natural Resource Defense Council's Climate Center, adding "that the buyout reflects the conclusion that big business can no longer ignore global warming and come up with sound business strategies." Tom "Smitty" Smith, director of watchdog group Public Citizen's Texas office and perhaps the state's foremost warlord against dirty coal, called the events "the tipping point in the battle over whether CO2 will be regulated by Congress," saying it's not a matter of if, but how soon. With eight more plants still being sought in Texas and at least 150 more proposed nationwide, Smitty said other utilities should heed this message: "The times have just changed, and anything you do will have to have a climate-change offset."
Their bloodlust temporarily satiated, the legions of fighters united against dirty coal including rural community groups, big city governments, and enviro-organizations, armed to the teeth with cash and high-powered lawyers now turn their attention to the eight remaining plants, proposed by seven different utilities and soon to be moving through the state permitting process. Marston said his staff is initiating detailed analyses of every proposed coal plant statewide and is planning to push harder for pending energy-efficiency measures at the Legislature, "demonstrating that there are faster, cheaper, and cleaner alternatives," to meet Texas' energy needs.
While the TXU events are being hailed as a resounding victory by those opposing dirty coal, concerns linger over whether the utility's new private ownership will obscure its operations from public scrutiny, how diligently the utility will set about cleaning up its existing plants (some among the nation's most polluting), whether it will move toward developing nukes, and what will happen to the utility's glowing green promises if its private equity firm owners flip TXU down the road (a common practice in the business).
TXU gave a corporate face to global warming and air pollution over the past year, to which the public dealt a colossal, financially debilitating bitch-slap. With TXU now trying to pull itself together, it's unclear whether other utilities want some.
Got something to say? The Chronicle welcomes opinion pieces on any topic from the community. Submit yours now at austinchronicle.com/opinion.