Mental Illness and Execution: Supremes to weigh in
Supreme Court will hear appeal of Texas death row inmate Scott Panetti, to address question of how mentally ill a person has to be for an execution to be considered cruel and unusual punishment
By Jordan Smith, Fri., Jan. 12, 2007
Panetti was convicted and sentenced to death, but his lawyers (led by Austin federal appellate guru Keith Hampton) have argued in his appeals that he's too insane to be killed and that to do so would amount to cruel and unusual punishment. Indeed, while Panetti is aware that he is to be killed for what he did, he believes that his execution is part of a grander conspiracy by the state to stop him from preaching the gospel. The state, meanwhile, has argued that Panetti has the capability to understand why he is being executed; therefore, the state argues, his sentence should be carried out.
Whether mere capacity to understand the sentence clears the way for an execution will be decided when the Supremes hear the case this spring. (For more on the case, see "Panetti Sane Enough to Die," Oct. 8, 2004.)
Got something to say on the subject? Send a letter to the editor.