Politics Trumps Science on Birth Control

Office of Women's Health official resigns in protest, comes to Austin to speak out

When taken within 72 hours after unprotected sex, the emergency contraceptive Plan B can reduce the risk of pregnancy by 89% – though the sooner it is taken, the better. Also known as the morning-after pill, Plan B consists of two 0.75 milligrams doses of levonorgestrel, the synthetic hormone that has been used in birth control pills for more than 35 years. On May 6, 2004, the Federal Drug Administration denied Plan B over-the-counter status, despite recommendations of approval from the Nonprescription Drugs Advisory Committee, the Advisory Committee for Reproductive Health, and FDA review officials. "The professional staff was pretty much entirely cut out of the last round of decision-making and didn't have much impact on the first round," said Dr. Susan Wood, who resigned from her post as director of the FDA's Office of Women's Health in protest of what can only be construed as politics trumping science. "As someone from the inside who is trained in science and someone who has been committed to good health policy and good women's health policy for 15 years, this is not the way we should be doing business," she said.

Dr. Wood is not alone in her assessment. According to a document published by the Government Accountability Office, entitled "Decision Process to Deny Initial Application for Over-the-Counter Marketing of the Emergency Contraceptive Drug Plan B Was Unusual," there are four main factors that are fishy. For starters, the directors of the offices that reviewed the application, who would "normally have been responsible for signing the Plan B action letter," disagreed with the decision to the point that they did not sign their names to the nonapproval letter. Second, the GOA found that the FDA's higher-ups were "more involved in the review of Plan B than in those of other OTC switch applications." Third, the GOA says there are "conflicting accounts" of whether or not the decision was made before the reviews were even completed, and that "the rationale for the Acting Director's decision was novel and did not follow FDA's traditional practices."

Also interesting is that the decision to deny OTC status was apparently based on the sole fact that the acting director found insufficient data on subjects younger than 14. But the GOA notes that, according to the deputy director of the Office of New Drugs, "there are no age-related marketing restrictions for any FDA-approved contraceptives, and FDA has not required any pediatric studies" for contraceptives in the past. Nevertheless, Plan B's manufacturer Barr Pharmaceuticals reapplied for OTC status with an age restriction of 16 and older, in the hopes that the amended application would be suitable. Instead, it languished for months before the FDA officially opted to delay the decision indefinitely, a move that infuriated Wood.

And so Wood has taken it upon herself to get the word out, traveling the country speaking out on what she sees as a grave threat to science-based agencies. She'll be in Austin for two events this week: The first, a free lecture entitled "The Controversy Over Emergency Contraception," takes place Thursday, Jan. 19, 3:30-5pm at the Harry Ransom Center; the second is a fundraising luncheon for the National Abortion Rights Action League honoring three courageous and inspiring women: Wood, Shelby Knox, and Bettie Naylor, on Friday, Jan. 20, 11:30am-1pm at the Hilton Hotel Downtown. (See Community Listings for more event details.)

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for almost 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

Support the Chronicle  

More reproductive rights
5th Circuit Strikes Down Texas Anti-Choice Law
5th Circuit Strikes Down Texas Anti-Choice Law
Judges say law would have forced women into "painful, invasive, and experimental" procedures

Mary Tuma, Oct. 23, 2020

As State Attacks, Planned Parenthood Expands
As State Attacks, Planned Parenthood Expands
Local clinic at Seventh and Chicon to undergo major renovation

Mary Tuma, Dec. 13, 2019

More by Diana Welch
The Real Cost of a Lap Dance?
The Real Cost of a Lap Dance?
Lawsuit cites violation of wage laws at strip clubs

Oct. 29, 2010

Mistrial, Retrial for McKay
Mistrial, Retrial for McKay
Jurors drop bomb on prosecutors' case against man accused of bomb-making

Feb. 6, 2009


reproductive rights, Barr Pharmaceuticals, Plan B, contraceptive, birth control, levonorgestrel, Federal Drug Administration, Nonprescription Drugs Advisory Committee, Advisory Committee for Reproductive Health, Susan Wood, Office of Women's Health, Government Accountability Office, Decision Process to Deny Initial Application for Over-the-Counter Marketing of the Emergency Contraceptive Drug Plan B Was Unusual

One click gets you all the newsletters listed below

Breaking news, arts coverage, and daily events

Can't keep up with happenings around town? We can help.

Austin's queerest news and events

New recipes and food news delivered Mondays

All questions answered (satisfaction not guaranteed)

Information is power. Support the free press, so we can support Austin.   Support the Chronicle