Naked City

Council Notes: Frosh Kim raises sand on the tax rate

Jennifer Kim proposed setting the maximum allowable property tax rate at the lowest of three proposed rates.
Jennifer Kim proposed setting the maximum allowable property tax rate at the lowest of three proposed rates. (Photo By John Anderson)

At the end of last Thursday's City Council meeting squatted Item 8, setting public hearings for the proposed property tax rate. New "truth in taxation" laws require public hearings any time there is a proposed tax increase, which please few but the grandstanding legislators who pen the proposals and the libertarian cranks the meetings bring out of the "small gummint" woodwork. In theory, the public input is commendable, but when it's budget time at City Hall the cart rides before the horse – for while only bits and pieces of the actual proposed budget have been reviewed, the law sets strict timetables for public input on the property tax rate – never mind that the tax rate hasn't been selected yet.

So to most on the council, Item 8 probably seemed a largely perfunctory measure, wherein the highest of three bandied-about tax rates would be set as the maximum rate, but (probably not) adopted. The late hour at which the vote occurred (around 11pm) also held little indication of controversy. So when Jennifer Kim proposed setting the maximum allowable property tax rate at the lowest of three proposed rates, she triggered a public dust-up on a council that prides itself (at least in public) on collegeality and discretion.

Kim initially urged adopting the "effective" rate (designed to bring in the same amount of money as the previous year) of 43.2 cents, as the proposed maximum. That's below both the "nominal" rate (44.3 cents, same as last year but collecting more money due to rising property values and development), and a compromise rate proposed earlier by City Manager Toby Futrell – 43.95 cents, which skews toward the nominal.

In a budget season focused on add-backs to services slashed during the city's slump, Kim's preemptive strike was not well received by her colleagues. Betty Dunkerley, in what seemed the prevailing sentiment, said Kim's motion provided no "wiggle room" for the 2005-06 budget. Briefings earlier that day echoed the majority's concerns – presentations from the departments of Parks and Recreation, Health and Human Services, Housing, and libraries all described the deleterious impact of cuts to their departments. Add-backs to the four departments total $2.6 million – which Kim insists is available without raising taxes. "I want to make it clear, if we stay at the effective tax rate, we will still be able to have the add-backs," Kim told me later.

Kim argues that by being "very aggressive in going for … grants and federal dollars" the city can restore the services to their precuts level as necessary. "It's up to our council to work hard, to look at all our departments, all our add-backs," she said, calling the living wage increase for city employees and restoration of social service contracts her main concerns. "We are just seeing a recovery in our economy," Kim cautioned, noting property taxes "overburden small homeowners," and "push people as well as businesses out of Austin," creating tax revenue loss.

Thursday night, Kim backed down from her initial proposal and tried to split the baby by moving to set the maximum rate at Futrell's proposed 43.95 cents. Describing it afterward as "one of the most strongly worded battles on the council in the two years I've been there," Brewster McCracken, said Thursday's skirmish "portends we're going to be locked in a serious budget fight." Raising the rhetorical ante, McCracken said he saw two mindsets that night: the majority's concern for the "social fabric of the community" versus the "same approach to governance that the Bush administration and the Perry administration have" to "bleed the beast" of government.

Ultimately, Kim's proposal was defeated as council voted 5-2 to adopt the current (nominal) rate as the maximum, with Kim joined only by Mayor Will Wynn. Wynn said he wanted to start low and work his way up, not the other way around – but just how that could be done under the new taxation laws remained unclear.

Council has time to cool down this week, as members don't meet until Aug. 18, when Wynn presents his plan to relocate the Green Water Plant (see "In Green Water, Mayor Finds His Signature Cause"), and the budget presentations (and battles) continue.

  • More of the Story

  • Naked City

    Headlines and happenings from Austin and beyond

    Naked City

    Moving treatment plant draws both applause and scrutiny from enviros
  • Naked City

    Local energy experts gather to discuss the peak oil theory

    Naked City

    Teachers union and Forgione spar over raises

    Naked City

    A national magazine ranks us tops, but some local leaders say it could still be better

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for almost 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

Support the Chronicle  

READ MORE
More Austin City Council
APD
APD "Reimagined" Training Academy Still a Work in Progress
Adoption of new curriculum for pilot cadet class scheduled for May 31

Austin Sanders, May 14, 2021

Lawsuit Seeks to Block Converting Microtel for Permanent Supportive Housing for City's Homeless
Lawsuit Seeks to Block Converting Microtel for Permanent Supportive Housing for City's Homeless
One project stalls, another moves along

Austin Sanders, Jan. 3, 2020

More by Wells Dunbar
Top 10 City Council Stories
Top 10 City Council Stories
Dais and months

Jan. 6, 2012

City Hall Hustle: The Hustle Bids Farewell ...
City Hall Hustle: The Hustle Bids Farewell ...
To the beating hearts of a great city

Dec. 30, 2011

KEYWORDS FOR THIS STORY

Austin City Council, Jennifer Kim, property tax rate, Toby Futrell, Brewster McCracken, Betty Dunkerly, Parks and Recreation Department, Health and Human Services Department, Housing, libraries

MORE IN THE ARCHIVES
NEWSLETTERS
One click gets you all the newsletters listed below

Breaking news, arts coverage, and daily events

Can't keep up with happenings around town? We can help.

Austin's queerest news and events

New recipes and food news delivered Mondays

Eric Goodman's Austin FC column, other soccer news

Information is power. Support the free press, so we can support Austin.   Support the Chronicle