Doughnuts No More!

Election statistics, maps, and analysis

For a larger map click <a href=smoking.jpg target=blank><b>here</b></a>
For a larger map click here

Is this what the much-vaunted realignment of Austin politics looks like? In both of the marquee contests on last week's ballot – the Place 3 race and the smoking ordinance – Austin voters turned in results notably different from the straight-up city vs. suburbs dynamic of prior years. The details:


Well, this much hasn't changed; as usual, voters in the Northwest and the Birkenstock Belt made up just shy of half the total electorate. Actually, compared to recent municipals, this was high turnout even for Central Austin, and slightly lower than expected in the Southwest.

Share of total vote:

The Smoking Ordinance

As has been widely noted, the smoking ordinance clearly increased turnout, with about one in six voters not bothering to voice their choices in the Council races. Which side were they on? Well, more than 60% of these votes citywide were cast in boxes that went for the smoking ban, which makes it reasonable to guess that new, pro-ordinance voters made the difference. As the map shows, the Tobacco Frontier lies pretty close to Lamar Blvd. Furthermore, one could make this the official Keep Austin Weird map, noting the concentrations of anti-ban sentiment in Central East Austin, south of Oltorf, and north of 51st, or the disjunction between strongly pro-ban Travis Heights and Cherrywood, and their anti-ban neighbors in Bouldin or Windsor Park. Discuss amongst yourselves.

Those new voters?
Ban turnout vs. P1 turnout+ 19.2%+ 13.1%+ 19.8%+ 16.7%+ 16.0%+ 17.3%+ 17.6%
Ordinance-only voters in:
Pro-ban boxes59.2%45.3%68.6%88.2%12.7%47.3%60.2%
Anti-ban boxes40.8%54.7%31.4%11.8%87.3%52.7%39.8%
For a larger map click <a href=place3.jpg target=blank><b>here</b></a>
For a larger map click here

Places 1 & 4

Lee Leffingwell and Betty Dunkerley had little trouble anywhere, but their opponents provided more than just token resistance. Toll Party poster child Casey Walker, unsurprisingly, made a real showing in the Southwest, while Andrew Bucknall picked up extra votes east of the highway. (As did the redoubtable Jennifer Gale.) Notably, Dunkerley did best this time in parts of town where she lagged in 2002. The smoking ban impacted Dunkerley the most out of all the candidates, with a citywide swing of nearly 12% between her results in pro-ban and anti-ban boxes.

Lee Leffingwell69.2%55.8%56.4%71.4%50.7%54.6%62.4%
Casey Walker11.2%13.0%14.4%10.0%14.9%20.4%13.5%
Scott Williams6.9%10.9%10.1%6.7%11.3%9.7%8.6%
Andrew Bucknall6.9%13.0%8.1%5.8%13.7%6.6%8.0%
James Paine3.5%5.0%5.1%3.2%6.0%5.1%4.3%
Steve Adams1.6%1.9%5.1%2.5%2.5%3.1%2.7%
Betty Dunkerley67.3%61.0%59.7%72.1%54.8%55.5%63.5%
Wes Benedict16.1%14.3%21.3%14.4%18.2%26.1%18.2%
Jennifer Gale8.9%11.0%9.6%7.1%13.1%9.5%9.3%
John Wickham5.8%6.8%6.4%4.6%9.5%6.3%6.1%
P. Byron Miller1.9%6.9%3.0%1.8%4.3%2.5%2.8%
Dunkerley vs. the smoking ban **
How Betty did in
Pro-ban boxes+ 4.0%+ 3.2%+ 1.3%+2.7%+ 15.3%+ 3.0%+ 4.8%
Anti-ban boxes– 6.1%– 2.4%– 2.9%– 18.5%– 1.8%– 2.7%– 7.0%

Place 3

So, did Jennifer Kim win, or did Gregg Knaupe lose? Only their consultants know for sure, but in the race to be the designated anti-Clarke, signs point to the latter. Even in his best turf – the Northwest and Southwest – Knaupe did little better than keep up with Kim, and her six-point lead in Central Austin put the kibosh on Knaupe's electoral plans. (The urban core provided both Clarke and Kim with their largest chunks of the total vote.) If anything, Knaupe took votes away from Clarke, rather than Kim – Margot's swing between Knaupe's stronger and weaker boxes is an alarming 15.2 points – which leaves something to be desired as a strategy to get into a run-off. Having said that, Clarke's lead going forward is pretty daunting. As the map shows, her strongest boxes (relative to Kim) stretch far beyond her urban-core base into the (anti-toll-road) suburbs. Citywide, however, Clarke's performance was generally unrelated to the strength of the anti-toll vote, and her performance was likewise fairly immune to influence by the smoking-ban vote, or to turnout variations in general. – Mike Clark-Madison

Margot Clarke50.7%43.1%29.5%33.4%43.1%38.5%40.4%
Jennifer Kim21.4%26.9%36.3%26.9%29.0%28.9%27.3%
Gregg Knaupe15.1%15.7%26.0%27.0%16.5%25.0%21.2%
Mandy Dealey12.8%14.3%8.2%12.7%11.4%7.6%11.2%
Clarke vs. tolls, smoking, APA/RECA **
Toll Party boxes*– 3.2%– 3.9%+ 3.1%+ 0.8%– 1.5%+ 1.9%– 0.9%
Other boxes+ 1.2%+ 3.2%– 4.3%– 0.3%+ 3.6%– 10.7%+ 0.8%
APA/RECA boxes*– 9.9%– 11.0%– 1.4%– 1.6%– 7.6%– 4.7%– 8.2%
Other boxes+ 1.7%+ 1.7%+ 5.5%+ 10.9%+ 1.5%+ 4.7%+ 7.0%
Pro-ban boxes– 0.5%+ 2.6%– 2.5%– 0.4%+ 10.8%– 1.7%– 1.6%
Anti-ban boxes+ 0.7%– 2.0%+ 5.5%+ 2.6%– 1.3%+ 1.6%+ 2.5%
High-turnout boxes+ 0.9%+ 7.0%– 0.1%– 0.7%+ 5.2%– 1.3%+ 1.3%
Low-turnout boxes– 9.4%– 4.3%+ 0.1%+ 3.1%– 2.0%+ 1.2%– 2.6%

NOTES: As usual, the geographic breakdown is by House district: C=D49, E=D46, NE=D50, NW=D48, SE=D51, SW=D47. Williamson Co. boxes are included under Northeast and Northwest as appropriate but aren't shown on the maps.

** These swings are shown compared to the candidate's overall performance. For example, Betty Dunkerley captured 67.3% of the Central Austin vote. In Central Austin boxes that went for the smoking ban, she did four points better than that (or 71.3%); in the anti-ban boxes, she did 6.1 points worse (or 61.2%).

* "Toll Party" boxes are ones where Casey Walker, in Place 1, got more than his 13.5% citywide average. "APA/RECA" boxes are ones where Gregg Knaupe, in Place 3, got more than his 21.2% average.

[Editor's note: The maps, charts, and accompanying analysis are a guest performance by former Chronicle City Editor Mike Clark-Madison, who really enjoys this sort of thing.]

Got something to say? The Chronicle welcomes opinion pieces on any topic from the community. Submit yours now at

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for over 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

Support the Chronicle  

More by Mike Clark-Madison
Austin at Large: Back (and Forth) to the Future
Austin at Large: Back (and Forth) to the Future
At some point Austin history will stop looping upon itself. Until next time …

March 17, 2023

Austin at Large: The Train Can’t Be Too Late
Austin at Large: The Train Can’t Be Too Late
It’s going to be sad, so sad, when Mayor Pete’s money comes if Austin’s not ready

March 10, 2023

One click gets you all the newsletters listed below

Breaking news, arts coverage, and daily events

Can't keep up with happenings around town? We can help.

Austin's queerest news and events

Eric Goodman's Austin FC column, other soccer news

All questions answered (satisfaction not guaranteed)

Information is power. Support the free press, so we can support Austin.   Support the Chronicle