Abbott Rules for Mothers

Doctors not liable for drug use reporting, AG says

In a Jan. 5 opinion, state Attorney General Greg Abbott ruled that doctors are not required to report to police their pregnant patients who have or are using drugs. State Rep. Ray Allen, R-Grand Prairie, asked Abbott to weigh in on the matter in September, after 47th District Attorney Rebecca King (prosecuting in Potter and Armstrong counties in the Panhandle) penned a letter to area physicians alerting them to their legal duty to report such activities pursuant to SB 319. Sponsored by Allen and passed into law last session, SB 319 amended the definition of "individual" under the penal code and civil remedy statutes to include an unborn child. Ostensibly, the idea behind the bill was to ensure criminal and civil liability in the event that a crime against a pregnant woman harmed or killed her fetus – for example, in a drunk driving accident.

The measure attracted the ire of some legislators – notably Rep. Jessica Farrar, D-Houston, who argued that the inclusion of a fetus in the definition of individual was merely a backdoor means to squash reproductive rights and legislate when life begins. In part to assuage these fears, the bill as passed specifically exempts the conduct of the mother or her health care provider, to ensure that the law is not interpreted as a ban on abortion. Yet, just three weeks after the law passed, King sent a letter to all doctors in her district, informing them that they could be held liable if they failed to report drug use by an expectant mother. According to King, the definition of individual under SB 319 affected not only the civil and criminal statutes it specifically amended, but also sections of the state's Controlled Substances Act, and of the Family Code related to child abuse. In her letter, King told doctors that her reasoning is based on a "clear reading" of the statutes. Allen protested and asked Abbott to review the law, and on Jan. 5, Abbott ruled in Allen's favor. SB 319 amends only the statutes specifically designated within the bill text, and King's inference that it affects the CSA and Family Code is faulty. A law cannot be amended merely "by reference to its title," Abbott opined. The new law "carefully excepts" the mother's conduct, he wrote, so to hold physicians liable for a patient's drug use, but to exempt the mother from liability would be "extremely inconsistent."

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for almost 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

Support the Chronicle  

READ MORE
More by Jordan Smith
'Chrome Underground' Goes Classic Car Hunting
'Chrome Underground' Goes Classic Car Hunting
Motoreum's Yusuf & Antonio talk about the biz and their reality TV debut

May 22, 2014

APD Brass Shifts Up, Down, Across
APD Brass Shifts Up, Down, Across
Musical chairs at Downtown HQ

May 9, 2014

KEYWORDS FOR THIS STORY

war on drugsabortion, Rebecca King, SB 319, Ray Allen, Greg Abbott

MORE IN THE ARCHIVES
NEWSLETTERS
One click gets you all the newsletters listed below

Breaking news, arts coverage, and daily events

Can't keep up with happenings around town? We can help.

Austin's queerest news and events

Updates for SXSW 2019

All questions answered (satisfaction not guaranteed)

Information is power. Support the free press, so we can support Austin.   Support the Chronicle