Naked City

Supremes Save Delma Banks?

Delma Banks is off death row.
Delma Banks is off death row. (Photo By Jordan Smith)

On Feb. 24, the U.S. Supreme Court threw out the death sentence of Texas inmate Delma Banks Jr. and remanded his case, granting him the right to further appeal his conviction. "Delma is, needless to say, happy and relieved," said Banks' attorney George Kendall. "He knows there's more to go, but that this is a very significant development."

Banks was convicted and sentenced to death for the 1980 murder of 16-year-old Richard Whitehead in a park near Texarkana – a crime Banks insists he did not commit. Banks' lawyers claim that Bowie Co. prosecutors lied to the court and withheld evidence favorable to Banks after they had promised the defense they had released all possibly exculpatory evidence – and the high court agreed in its sternly worded 7-2 decision (with justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas dissenting). "When police or prosecutors conceal significant exculpatory or impeaching material in the State's possession, it is ordinarily incumbent on the State to set the record straight," Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote for the majority.

During his two-day trial, Bowie Co. prosecutors claimed Banks shot Whitehead so that he could take the teenager's car and drive to Dallas. But hard evidence supporting that claim was not easy to come by, so prosecutors instead relied almost exclusively on the testimony of two witnesses, Charles Cook and Robert Farr – both of whom later recanted. Questions about the testimony of each witness has for 23 years formed the basis of Banks' appeals, and those questions lie at the heart of the high court's decision.

Cook testified that he met Banks in Dallas the weekend of the murder when Banks appeared in front of his house in Whitehead's car. Mere hours later, Cook said, Banks confessed he'd killed Whitehead, then asked Cook to dispose of the car and the murder weapon. Farr, meanwhile, claimed that Banks asked him to come with him to Dallas shortly after the murder so that Banks could get a gun to commit robberies.

Prosecutors did not tell the court that Farr was a paid informant, paid by a local sheriff's deputy to get a gun from Banks. When asked in court whether he was an informant, Farr said he was not, a lie that prosecutors did not correct. Further, the state failed to acknowledge or turn over evidence that prosecutors had coached Cook extensively regarding his testimony about the weekend of the murder. When asked in court whether he had rehearsed his testimony, Cook said no, another lie that prosecutors ignored.

It wasn't until the mid-Nineties that Banks' attorneys discovered evidence that prosecutors had withheld and then lied about evidence favorable to Banks. Still, both the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals and the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals denied Banks' right to further appeal on those claims, and ruled that Banks could not prove that prosecutorial misconduct affected the outcome of his trial – which was the same position that the state argued before the Supremes in December.

But that argument did not impress the high court justices: "Our decisions lend no support to the notion that defendants must scavenge for hints of undisclosed ... material when the prosecution represents that all such material has been disclosed," Ginsburg wrote. "A rule thus declaring 'prosecutor may hide, defendant must seek' is not tenable in a system constitutionally bound to accord defendants due process."

  • More of the Story

  • Naked City

    Headlines and happenings from Austin and beyond

    Naked City

    The Eastside charter school begins its bankruptcy proceedings

    Naked City

    Nobody voted for it, but insta-teacher certification is now the law

    Naked City

    Design standards sought to upgrade Austin's chain-retail sprawl
  • Naked City

    APD and the sheriff take different approaches to comply with state law

    Naked City

    An angry rant by a redistricting disenfranchisee

    Naked City

    Austin leaders pledge to defend local businesses from anti-abortion boycott

    Naked City

    John Kerry rolls over John Edwards for the Democratic presidential nomination

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for almost 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

Support the Chronicle  

READ MORE
MORE Death Penalty
Death Watch: Madness and Forensics
Death Watch: Madness and Forensics
Two capital cases raise psychological and evidentiary issues

Jordan Smith, Oct. 4, 2013

Death Watch: Running Low on Poison
Death Watch: Running Low on Poison
The state of Texas has three executions' worth of pentobarbitol

Jordan Smith, Aug. 9, 2013

More by Jordan Smith
'Chrome Underground' Goes Classic Car Hunting
'Chrome Underground' Goes Classic Car Hunting
Motoreum's Yusuf & Antonio talk about the biz and their reality TV debut

May 22, 2014

APD Brass Shifts Up, Down, Across
APD Brass Shifts Up, Down, Across
Musical chairs at Downtown HQ

May 9, 2014

KEYWORDS FOR THIS STORY

Delma Banks, U.S. Supreme Court, death penalty, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, prosecutorial misconduct

MORE IN THE ARCHIVES
NEWSLETTERS
One click gets you all the newsletters listed below

Breaking news, arts coverage, and daily events

Can't keep up with happenings around town? We can help.

Austin's queerest news and events

Updates for SXSW 2019

All questions answered (satisfaction not guaranteed)

Information is power. Support the free press, so we can support Austin.   Support the Chronicle