https://www.austinchronicle.com/news/2003-05-30/161544/
Either Brewster McCracken or Margot Clarke, on the other hand, will have the unenviable experience of paddling up a river of red ink for an entire council term. (You can't blame them for already envisioning a post-bust re-election effort.) Other than Garcia's proposed smoking ordinance, there's not much else to talk about on the campaign trail heading for the June 7 run-off for the Place 5 seat being vacated by Wynn. Here's what they have to say:
"But not across the board," McCracken continues. "I don't know, for instance, that people want to shut down afterschool programs regardless of the budget. There are still some areas that are off-limits."
Clarke isn't sure she agrees with Wynn's (and McCracken's) at-least-implied argument that citizens "would accept losing city services if they don't have to pay for them" through tax increases. "But it's important for the city to make that information available to the people who live here, [and for] people in Austin to prioritize what they really expect the city to do for them -- and what they're willing to pay for it."
While it's typical for officeholders (and candidates) to assume that the public will avoid tax hikes at all costs, Clarke says "the ACC election" -- where voters on May 3 agreed, by a compelling margin, to a sizable tax increase for the community college -- "suggests to me that people might be willing to pay more if they know what they're getting. Sharing that information is going to be critical to get through this process without people feeling they're getting ripped off or underserved."
McCracken likewise thinks "everything has to be on the table" where tax rates are concerned. "That's the only responsible position. With all the folks on fixed incomes, it's hard, but we need to be able to protect social services right now."
But unlike Futrell and her budget staff, which last year and (so far) this year has laid everything but public-safety first response on the block, McCracken also aims, as noted above, to protect social services and afterschool programs. "Particularly with the state cuts going on," he says, referring to the Legislature's slash-and-burn, ideologically driven budget. "Those will create more need locally, so even holding the line locally on social-service spending will still mean reduced service to people in need."
Clarke has been, if not less committed, then perhaps less worried about protecting public safety -- "Of course it's very important, yet I think most people realize that city government wouldn't make budget decisions that will endanger public safety." But she does think "we need to hold harmless those things that will end up costing us more if they're cut." That starts with health care, particularly preventive and acute care at the clinic level that can keep people out of the hospitals and emergency rooms. "It's a huge crisis everywhere, and it's just going to get worse."
Clarke also includes environmental protection among those programs where short-term cuts lead to long-term costs, "though that isn't as big a spending program" as health care. (Other than public safety, nothing is.) "There are other aspects of social services that prevent more expense down the line. Even Brewster says money spent on afterschool programs saves money on police."
Clarke and McCracken both endorse Futrell's effort to tap into the creative ideas and expertise both of the city's front-line employees and of the citizens to find cost savings, and McCracken adds that the leaner-and-meaner message need not only apply to the General Fund. "We do need to produce more efficiencies in the enterprise funds (like the utilities), either to increase transfers or reduce their fees. My sense is we haven't been giving the same scrutiny to those funds."
Copyright © 2024 Austin Chronicle Corporation. All rights reserved.