Boys Will Be Hawks
By Michael King, Fri., May 17, 2002
Cornyn, on the other hand, went beyond even Bush's initial attempts at public evenhandedness, saying, "we must place the onus where it belongs, which is squarely on the Palestinians to stop the violence." He argued that his perspective made him even more "pro-Israel" than his rival. But Cornyn is not yet in the league of U.S. Rep. Tom DeLay, R-Houston, who criticized the White House for even suggesting Israel should negotiate with any Palestinians at all. (A considerable chunk of the GOP's Christian fundamentalist base believes fervently that Israel's eventual acquisition of all its purported Old Testament territory will be the welcome precursor of Armageddon and eventually the Rapture. For them.) DeLay is not alone, of course; both houses of Congress passed resolutions May 2 supporting Israel's invasions of the occupied territories, rejecting even the White House request that denunciation of Palestinians be diminished: Senate, 94-2; House, 352-21.
But the heavyweight champion of recent American-Likud politics was Dick Armey, R-Dallas, who on May 1 told a national TV audience for CNBC's Hardball, "I happen to believe the Palestinians should leave" the occupied territories, and Israel should simply grab the entire West Bank. He added that any future Palestinian state could simply be carved out of "Arab" countries. "There are many Arab nations," Armey said, "that have many hundreds of thousands of acres of land and soil and property and opportunity to a Palestinian state."
When many Arab-Americans, including some in his North Texas district, protested Armey's remarks as racist and in effect promoting "ethnic cleansing," he backed off and issued a statement saying he was not referring to the expulsion of "peaceful Palestinian civilians," only "terrorists." Tell it to Sharon -- and Benjamin Netanyahu.
Got something to say? The Chronicle welcomes opinion pieces on any topic from the community. Submit yours now at austinchronicle.com/opinion.