No Parking at Pease

Griffith: Don't Even Think of Parking Here


Bobbitt asked to extend his driveway across green to access Kingsbury Road
After a three-week hiatus from the desperations of government, the council displayed a decidedly recuperative tone at last week's meeting. Generally pedestrian items prevailed, ensuring the city's continued functioning without worsening holiday hangovers. In the near-total absence of weightiness, a seemingly false drama was accorded one individual's bid to construct a driveway through a patch of unused park land. City Hall is considered a crucible for madness, and the two hours of ad hominem that accompanied the proposal did nothing to dispel that perception.

But beneath the façade of simplicity lay a stumping mess of legal questions that may have meant the removal of Pease Park from public hands, and the setting of precedent with regards to displacing park land. Greenspace is sacred in Austin, and increasingly hard to acquire; thus, University of Texas law professor Philip Bobbitt assembled a sterling cast of luminaries from the Old West Austin social structure to shore up his argument that he should be allowed to extend his driveway through a patch of unused land in Pease Park, and persuaded Ronney Reynolds and Mayor Bruce Todd to sponsor his proposal.

All this attention for a piece of land about the size of two parking spaces may seem strange, but the land is officially part of Pease Park, the city's quintessential inner-city greenway that meanders along Shoal Creek in West Austin and is a favorite among frisbee golfers, volleyball enthusiasts, and dog-walkers looking for a friendly no-leash area. The 425-square-foot strip that Bobbitt wants stretches from his property line to Kingsbury Road, a length of about 10 feet that includes land designated as Pease Park. But the greenway that people actually use doesn't begin until the other side of Kingsbury Road, where Shoal Creek runs.

The fact that the strip Bobbitt wants is separated from Pease Park proper by Kingsbury Road prompted one speaker's assessment that the land in question is "useless" and "trash-strewn and poison ivy-riddled." Still, park purists like Councilmember Beverly Griffith and other protestors would brook no concession. Griffith and others argued that the land provides a "vegetative buffer" that protects area residents from park noise. But the only vegetation on the proposed site is grass, and whom that protects is anybody's guess.

Bobbitt lives atop the hill that rises from Kingsbury Road, on Windsor Street, amid the Alfa Romeos and the Porsches and the grand homes that characterize the Pemberton Heights neighborhood. He, and prominent friends like radio personality Betty Sue Flowers, complain that his current driveway requires him to negotiate the dicey corner of Enfield and Windsor, where hurtling cars spring from blind curves. "My late father was hit here three times," he said at the meeting. The Old Enfield Neighborhood Association supported the proposal in a testimony of sympathy to Bobbitt's predicament.

The Public Works Department reported that in less than two years, there have been five reported accidents at the corner. Nonetheless, it isn't considered unsafe by state transportation standards. And although Todd repeatedly attempted to fish a personal judgment from Public Works Director Peter Rieck on the safety of the intersection, Rieck refused to bite, conceding only that more "site distance" would be preferable. Nor does the Public Works Department recommend additional safety features like a traffic light, although councilmembers opposed to the driveway offered it as a solution.

Bobbitt will accept the traffic light; but it's the driveway -- down the hill behind his house to Kingsbury road -- that he really wants. He brought in engineers from the high-dollar firm of Espey Huston & Associates to argue the environmental positives of the road design, and to promise an engineering marvel of modernity, complete with switchbacks and a 15-foot-high wall to retain polluted run-off. Bobbitt covets the land so much that he and his supporters argued that the proposed driveway would bring more of a residential presence to the unpopulated Kingsbury Road, thus helping to eradicate the prostitution and sexual activity that goes on at night in the park's more secluded enclaves. "This is an effort to solve the criminal problem," he said, referring to the possibility that lights and traffic in the deserted area would discourage those intent on "cruising," as Bobbitt called it.

Such expansive arguments held no quarter with Griffith, whose homework produced key arguments that turned the scope of the debate from a simple zoning case to a threat to all park land. For one, the park's deed explains that if any part of the park is not used for pleasure, it will revert to the deeder, former Gov. Elisha Pease. Griffith also pointed out that Chapter 26 of the Texas Parks & Wildlife Code says that public park land can only be relinquished if there are no prudent alternatives to doing so. Griffith pointed out five alternate routes Bobbitt could take; one included a stoplight and was less than two minutes away. Because of the alternatives available, the Parks & Recreation Department recommended denial.

Though Bobbitt had suggested the city lease the land to him to avoid the latter conundrum, Griffith, Gus Garcia, Daryl Slusher, and Jackie Goodman would take no chances and voted against the proposal. And as the councilmember who took the vocal lead in the movement to de-pollute Springdale Park in Northeast Austin last year, Eric Mitchell was a sure bet to side with the Springdale Park activists who showed up to lodge their concerns about the precedent Bobbitt was asking the council to set, leaving Todd and Reynolds on the short end of a 5-2 vote.

Though the driveway issue wasn't life-or-death, it did prove, once again, that Griffith is a stalwart park land purist and further put to rest widespread concern -- voiced by environmentalists during her election campaign -- that her real estate involvement and her inclusion in West Austin social circles would limit her resoluteness. As a parks department board member for 10 years and as president of the Austin Parks Foundation, Griffith has been a lead voice on efforts to protect the city's greenways -- witness her unpopular stand against the Bloch Cancer Survivors' Park last fall. In the Bloch case, the proposed memorial to cancer sufferers at Town Lake would still have been in public hands, but Griffith refused to give away an inch of green. In Bobbitt's case, where Griffith painted it as a question of one man's convenience against the availability of parkland for the entire city, the answer was easy. When Griffith says "park," she ain't talking about your car.


Also Last Week...

...Mitchell abstained. In itself, this is not news. The councilmember's oft-careless attitude makes him an devotee of the abstention -- or "The big A," as he calls it -- often after walking onto the dais at the tail-end of a vote.

But when his insurance company, Wormley-Mitchell & Associates, has been poised to possibly benefit from a city contract, it's been a whole new ball game. At least twice, Mitchell may have skirted city and state law by voting to award a contract to one of his insurance recipients. One of those contracts recently went to Prism Development, owned by Capital Metro Chair Michael Van Ohlen. Perhaps because this paper criticized Mitchell for his vote, or perhaps because election season is upon us, Mitchell, without comment, abstained last week on awarding a $67,405 contract to the very same company -- Prism Development -- for construction at the Metz and Hancock Recreation Centers. Bravo for that New Year's resolution.

Also, Jackie Goodman's proposal to formulate the Conference of Texas Cities -- a coalition of Texas towns that would, as a group, hire lobbyists to protect their interests at the lege -- was delayed last week because of a lack of input on the proposal from other cities. The coalition's efforts would be in addition to the $415,000 contract already awarded to Don Adams and Angelo Zottarelli for their lobbying efforts on Austin's behalf. (Think we don't need more help? Just take a walk down memory lane to 1995's Austin-bashing session.) However, in a short discussion, the mayor persuaded his colleagues of the need to find common ground among the cities before funding is approved. Goodman isn't giving up hope, and plans to float another proposal whereby specialty lobbyists will be hired on an as-needed basis.


This Week in Council:

Still adrift in political purgatory are two hotly contested items that will soon reach the council dais. One is the proposal for an electric rate reduction for six of the city's largest electricity users (IBM, Motorola, AMD, Seton Hospital, Texas Instruments, and Applied Materials). Consumer advocates worry that such a move may shift the burden of paying for our debt-ridden utility to residents and small businesses. The decision was put off in December pending a cost of service study, which is expected to be completed this week.

Also looming is Reynolds' proposal to revamp council meeting rules to, as he terms it, improve protocol and increase public participation. Not all council participants see it that way, though. Daryl Slusher requested a delay in December to receive more input on the proposal.

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for almost 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

Support the Chronicle  

READ MORE
More Council Watch
Council Watch
Council Watch
Council approves spending $15 million on the Convention Center Hotel; City Manager Jesus Garza presents the Draft Policy Budget; and Roma Design Group announces its vision for the south shore of Town Lake.

Kevin Fullerton, July 7, 2000

Council Watch
Council Watch
The council approves on first reading an East Austin apartment complex 500 feet away from a plant where toxic chemicals are stored, but some council members are promising to scuttle the project if it comes back for final approval.

Kevin Fullerton, June 30, 2000

MORE IN THE ARCHIVES
NEWSLETTERS
One click gets you all the newsletters listed below

Breaking news, arts coverage, and daily events

Can't keep up with happenings around town? We can help.

Austin's queerest news and events

Updates for SXSW 2019

All questions answered (satisfaction not guaranteed)

Information is power. Support the free press, so we can support Austin.   Support the Chronicle