[Staff writer Mary Tuma responds: My goal is to shine a light on the attacks toward women’s health care, not encourage divisiveness. To the claim that “anti-choice” is “just as accurate” as “anti-abortion”: I consciously and deliberately employ the term “anti-choice” to signify the fact that those who advocate against abortion are also advocating more broadly against a woman’s right to choose what’s best for her body when it comes to reproductive health care in general, and thus, her quality of life and her future. The term “anti-choice” is not meant to be “caustic” as Mr. Bluejay asserts, but to reinforce the reality that lawmakers are not just restricting abortion but women’s bodily autonomy.
Perhaps Mr. Bluejay would be better served directing his media criticism to the many mainstream news reporters who continue to use the phrase “pro-life” when describing the anti-abortion camp, a far more “divisive” and misleading rhetorical term, considering their lack of empathy for survivors of rape, incest, and life-threatening pregnancy complications when crafting and supporting abortion laws.]
Information is power. Support the free press, so we can support Austin. Support the Chronicle