In Silico

In Silico

2021, NR, 83 min. Directed by Noah Hutton. Narrated by Noah Hutton.

REVIEWED By Richard Whittaker, Fri., April 30, 2021

There are two ways to study the brain: in vivo (in a living organism) or in vitro (in the petri dish). But what if there was a third way? Neuroscientist Henry Markram envisions in silico, and that was the root of his Blue Brain Project: a plan to create a full electronic brain. But was Markram an interdisciplinary visionary, an arrogant techno dude bro, or Don Quixote?

It's incorrect to describe In Silico as Noah Hutton's documentary follow-up to to his brilliant, incisive techno-satire Lapsis, since he's been working on it for a decade. Filming, he notes in his own commentary, began not long after Markram took to the TED stage and predicted that, not only was replicating the human brain doable, but that if it worked then he would be able to send a hologram to deliver a talk by itself.

The ambition, and Markram's best intentions, are clearly laid out. If the brain can be genuinely replicated electronically – not emulated, not simulated – then we can understand how it works and, if from there, what can be done to fix it. Markram is also presented by many of his peers, a succession of neuroscientists, as a game changer: Rather than a technologist coming in and saying that they can make a computer as smart as a human, this was a researcher applying patterns from prior research through the most complicated modeling ever envisioned.

Once past the introductory essay on neuroscience to give the audience even the faintest clue what Markram is planning, Hutton pulls out the real subject up for dissection. Matrkram's ambition was undeniable, but there were a lot of researchers who saw it as a billion-euro boondoggle, driven by hubris and tolerating no criticism or dissent – the very core of the scientific process. It becomes a story of shifting goals and landmarks, of sparring approaches, and Hutton is undoubtedly embedded on one side of the conflict, making him a inadvertent player in the battle. However, unlike many documentarians, he doesn't paint himself as some naif: Films like Deep Time prove his adeptness with massive, complicated, longitudinal systems, and the fact he spent a decade on this film means that he deeply understands the subject, and can engage with the issues. Yet that decade may have played against him: In attempting to synthesize so much material into In Silico, he creates something that feels more like a series of encyclopedia entries than a story.

Available as a virtual cinema release now.

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for over 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

Support the Chronicle  

More Noah Hutton Films
Bleak but funny look at life at the low end of the high-tech gig economy

Richard Whittaker, Feb. 12, 2021

More by Richard Whittaker
The Sound of Crystals at <i>Corteo</i>
The Sound of Crystals at Corteo
Inside rehearsals at the traveling Cirque du Soleil show

Feb. 3, 2023

Review: <i>Flood of Spirits</i>
Review: Flood of Spirits
World premiere conjures up a haunting evening

Feb. 3, 2023


In Silico, Noah Hutton

One click gets you all the newsletters listed below

Breaking news, arts coverage, and daily events

Can't keep up with happenings around town? We can help.

Austin's queerest news and events

Eric Goodman's Austin FC column, other soccer news

Behind the scenes at The Austin Chronicle

Information is power. Support the free press, so we can support Austin.   Support the Chronicle