The U.S. vs. John Lennon

2006, PG-13, 99 min. Directed by David Leaf, John Scheinfeld.

REVIEWED By Marjorie Baumgarten, Fri., Sept. 29, 2006

The U.S. vs. John Lennon

Keeping company with the memory of John Lennon is usually time well-spent, and this documentary, which focuses mostly on the years the former Beatle lived in New York, is no different. Yet, if you come to the film expecting to learn any new details about Lennon’s legacy or the Nixon administration’s near-comical attempts to deport the rock icon, you’ll be sorely disappointed. The U.S. vs. John Lennon uses old documentary footage and lots of talking heads to tell a story about the political ferment of the late Sixties and early Seventies and Lennon’s participation in the political fray. It will probably be eye-opening to younger audiences who were not weaned on this stuff, but to boomers, it will probably play like a VH1 Behind the Music episode, which is essentially what this documentary is, having been co-produced by the aforesaid music channel. Lennon’s image is further burnished by the active participation in this film of his widow Yoko Ono, and all the messier aspects of Lennon’s life during this period (drug use, marital infidelity, and political naivete) are barely mentioned, if at all. Some reference is made to the viewpoint that Lennon was used as a tool by more savvy political operatives of the time: Abbie Hoffman, Jerry Rubin, and the Black Panthers. The cast of talking heads paying tribute to the Lennon legacy or providing insight about the time range from Walter Cronkite to Geraldo Rivera, Angela Davis to G. Gordon Liddy, George McGovern to Bobby Seale, and Gore Vidal to Noam Chomsky. (One of the growing questions about this decade of documentary filmmaking is whether a film can legitimize its lefty credentials without including comments by standard-bearer Chomsky.) The first half of The U.S. vs. John Lennon is a historical review of the post-Beatles Lennon and the public artworks for peace he and his new bride fashioned to goad the already-captive media circus that was consumed with their lives. The latter half explores the efforts of Nixon, FBI director J. Edgar Hoover, and Sen. Strom Thurmond to expel the British upstart from their shores. Passing comparisons are made between their clumsy tactics and the current-day PATRIOT Act surveillance allowances, but comparisons between the rising tide of opinion against U.S. involvement in Vietnam and the present war in Iraq are mostly left unspoken. The U.S. vs. John Lennon is a refresher course in the perils of celebrity and activism, but its syllabus and insights are purely remedial.

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for over 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

Support the Chronicle  

More Films
Everyone Will Burn
Spanish faith-based horror commits the sin of predictability

Jenny Nulf, Dec. 1, 2023

The Disappearance of Shere Hite
Restoring the reputation of the sexologist and researcher

Alejandra Martinez, Dec. 1, 2023

More by Marjorie Baumgarten
Joy Ride
Raunchy road trip goes all the way to China for filthy fun

July 7, 2023

All That Breathes
The struggle by three men to save the endangered black kite

March 31, 2023


The U.S. vs. John Lennon, David Leaf, John Scheinfeld

One click gets you all the newsletters listed below

Breaking news, arts coverage, and daily events

Keep up with happenings around town

Kevin Curtin's bimonthly cannabis musings

Austin's queerest news and events

All questions answered (satisfaction not guaranteed)

Information is power. Support the free press, so we can support Austin.   Support the Chronicle