APD (Finally) Ends Low-Level Marijuana Enforcement

Chief announces move, six months after Council told him to

Austin Police Department officers will no longer issue citations or make arrests in most low-level Possession of Marijuana cases, according to a memo from Police Chief Brian Manley.

The announcement fulfills a mandate set by City Council more than six months ago and marks a 180-degree turn by Manley, who told reporters Jan. 24 – less than 24 hours after the unanimous Council vote – “Direction given to officers has been, we have not changed our enforcement protocols today.”

Image by Getty Images

This defiant stance has gone by the wayside, as has much of Manley’s support at City Hall. “APD will no longer cite or arrest individuals” for Class A or B PoM offenses “unless there is an immediate threat to a person’s safety, or doing so as part of the investigation of a high priority, felony-level narcotics case or the investigation of a violent felony.”

The phrase “high priority” doesn’t have a legal definition, but it does appear to be a response to Council’s direction to end marijuana enforcement not just for misdemeanor possession (less than 2 ounces) but also for larger amounts unless there’s a link to alleged drug trafficking or violent felonies. The Council resolution also covers possession of edibles and vape pens, which remain felonies under state statute.

Council made this move in January amid the continued fallout of the 2019 legislation that legalized non-narcotic hemp – defined by a low concentration of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the psychoactive agreement in cannabis. This meant that even the most routine PoM cases would require expensive lab tests that most law enforcement agencies cannot conduct or afford. In response, Travis County prosecutors, along with many of their peers throughout the state, announced such cases would not (at least for now) be brought to court. Council sought to build on this de facto decriminalization by ending APD enforcement, and the negative (and racially disproportionate) repercussions for harmless low-level use. That’s when Manley balked.

The Jan. 23 resolution also prohibited the use of city resources to conduct PoM testing, a provision Manley agreed to comply with in May. That likely means anyone who was arrested or ticketed by APD since the hemp law took effect (June 10, 2019) need not worry about being prosecuted in the future should testing become more widely available. The statute of limitations on misdemeanor PoM charges is two years.

In 2017, 32% of people arrested for PoM offenses were Black, although they account for only 8% of the population in Austin. Similarly, Hispanic Austinites accounted for 43% of arrests but only about 34% of the city’s population; meanwhile, white residents made up 24% of arrests, despite representing nearly half of the city’s population. APD data for 2020 shows similar disparities in arrests made for Class A, B, and C misdemeanors that are eligible for citation, many of which are PoM offenses (though the report does not indicate how many).

Council Member Greg Casar, who introduced the Jan. 23 resolution, applauded Manley’s belated change of heart. “Today, Austin has finally ended all arrests and tickets for personal marijuana possession,” Casar wrote in a statement. “When people organize for racial justice, they can make real change. Although the Police Chief should have made this change the day after City Council passed my resolution directing this back in January, it finally happened today because of continued community advocacy.”

Before the resolution, arrests for PoM offenses had already been dropping. APD reports on its discretionary arrests quarterly: that data shows 17 PoM arrests (as opposed to citations) in Q2 (April-June) 2019 when the hemp law took effect, 8 in Q3, and 9 in Q4. In Q1 2020, when the Council resolution was adopted, there were 3; data for Q2, which ended this week, will be released in August.

Data on the far more numerous PoM citations during this period is not reported regularly. The Chronicle has sought this information from APD, the Travis County Attorney’s Office, Austin Municipal Court, and Justice of the Peace, Precinct 5 – all entities that deal with such tickets – but each has said they do not have the numbers.

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for almost 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

Support the Chronicle  

READ MORE
More Marijuana
Abbott Orders Texas Prosecutors to Enforce Marijuana Laws
Abbott Orders Texas Prosecutors to Enforce Marijuana Laws
Travis County D.A. says dismissals will continue

Kevin Curtin, July 18, 2019

Travis County to Reject Marijuana Prosecutions
Travis County to Reject Marijuana Prosecutions
Officers can't legally determine what is weed and what is hemp

Kevin Curtin, July 3, 2019

More by Austin Sanders
Police Chief Fights Back as Council Cuts APD Budget
Police Chief Fights Back as Council Cuts APD Budget
Chief Brian Manley remains defiant

Aug. 7, 2020

Reports Challenge
Reports Challenge "Fear-Based" Model for Training APD Cadets
Police Academy zero

Aug. 7, 2020

KEYWORDS FOR THIS POST

Marijuana, Austin Police Department, possession of marijuana, Brian Manley, Greg Casar, Austin City Council, decriminalization, Austin City Hall

MORE IN THE ARCHIVES
NEWSLETTERS
One click gets you all the newsletters listed below

Breaking news, arts coverage, and daily events

Can't keep up with happenings around town? We can help.

Austin's queerest news and events

New recipes and food news delivered Mondays

All questions answered (satisfaction not guaranteed)

Information is power. Support the free press, so we can support Austin.   Support the Chronicle