Third Court of Appeals Rejects Convention Center Ballot Language

Unconventionalists win a round against Council

Last Thursday, Aug.22, the Third Court of Appeals ruled in favor of a petition filed by Nelson Linder that challenged the proposition ballot language recently adopted by the City Council concerning the Convention Center and the Hotel Occupancy Tax.

Austin Convention Center (Photo by Jana Birchum)

The court ruled that the ballot language – the result of a petition sponsored by Unconventional Austin and signed by more than 30,000 residents – “inadequately describes the proposed ordinance,” which (if adopted by the voters) would 1) require voter approval of any Convention Center expansion or redesign costing more than $20 million; 2) limit any Convention Center HOT funding to 34% of revenues; 3) continue the current HOT spending of 15% on cultural arts and 15% on historic preservation; and 4) allocate the remainder (i.e., 36%) to “support and enhance Austin’s cultural tourism industry.”

The ballot language adopted by Council (during a confused and confusing Aug. 8 post-midnight discussion) is vaguer in detail, does not address the specific reallocation of HOT funding except in the limits it would place on Convention Center spending, and adds the prospect of the potential costs of referendum elections.

The court’s ruling rejects the language concerning the cost of elections, noting that such an election could occur at a regular election date (meaning the city would incur no additional election costs). Moreover, ruled the court, “The ballot language also misleads voters by omitting a chief feature of the proposed ordinance – the intention that citizens vote on the prioritization of how hotel-occupancy tax revenue should be spent.” Citing precedent, the court ruled that the Council’s adopted language therefore “‘mislead[s] the voters by omitting certain chief features that reflect its character and purpose.’”

“In sum,” wrote the court, “the ballot language ordered by the City Council affirmatively misrepresents future election costs associated with the ordinance and also omits a chief feature of the proposed ordinance—the fact that the ordinance would require the City to prioritize the spending of hotel-occupancy tax revenue on cultural arts, historic preservation, and ‘Austin’s Cultural Tourism Industry,’ to the exclusion of other uses allowable under the Tax Code.” The court issued a writ of mandamus requiring the city to adopt compliant ballot language by Aug. 28 – a deadline allowing time for court approval before Sept. 5, when ballots must be submitted for printing. The city can appeal the ruling, adopt the language proposed in the original petition, or rewrite Council’s language to eliminate mention of election costs while adding language addressing the re-allocation of HOT funding.

Notably, the court’s ruling does not address the potential legality of the proposition (aka “Prop B”), and (in a footnote) specifically notes that “the validity of the proposed ordinance is not at issue in this proceeding.” The city has contended that the proposed reallocation would violate state law limiting HOT cultural and historic preservation spending to the existing 30%, and would also violate the City Charter by attempting to appropriate spending by referendum. The ruling does not address those questions.

Got something to say on the subject? Send a letter to the editor.

A note to readers: Bold and uncensored, The Austin Chronicle has been Austin’s independent news source for over 40 years, expressing the community’s political and environmental concerns and supporting its active cultural scene. Now more than ever, we need your support to continue supplying Austin with independent, free press. If real news is important to you, please consider making a donation of $5, $10 or whatever you can afford, to help keep our journalism on stands.

Support the Chronicle  

More Convention Center
Political Action Committee Proclaims Support for Convention Center
PHAM says expansion means millions in community benefits

Michael King, Aug. 8, 2019

Petitions Filed to Force Vote on Convention Center
Convention Center Petitions
“Unconventional Austin” PAC submits signatures to city clerk

Michael King, July 15, 2019

More Hotel Occupancy Tax
Council Recap: The Beat Goes On, Ever So Slowly
Council Recap: The Beat Goes On, Ever So Slowly
Music scene frustrated at pace of COVID relief

Austin Sanders, Dec. 4, 2020

New, Improved Camping Ban Fizzles at Council
New, Improved Camping Ban Fizzles at Council
Consensus collapses as the hot summer of homelessness drags on

Austin Sanders, Sept. 23, 2019

More by Michael King
Point Austin: The Never-Ending Story
Point Austin: The Never-Ending Story
Millions of guns, and countless murders

Feb. 20, 2024

Paxton’s Impeachment Circus Continues Into 2024
Paxton’s Impeachment Circus Continues Into 2024
Dan Patrick’s denunciation of the House decision to impeach confirms entire trial was tilted in Paxton’s favor

Dec. 15, 2023


Convention Center, Hotel Occupancy Tax, Third Court of Appeals, November 2019 Election

One click gets you all the newsletters listed below

Breaking news, arts coverage, and daily events

Keep up with happenings around town

Kevin Curtin's bimonthly cannabis musings

Austin's queerest news and events

Eric Goodman's Austin FC column, other soccer news

Information is power. Support the free press, so we can support Austin.   Support the Chronicle